论我国死刑案件审判程序的完善

发布时间：2018-12-30 14:42

【摘要】：死刑是惩罚犯罪最严厉的方式之一,死刑的适用关乎人的生命,一旦执行错误,就会发生错杀、滥杀。因此,对于死刑制度,我国采取了十分谨慎的态度。由于死刑案件本身具有特殊性,因而我国对于死刑案件的审判程序的规定要比普通的刑事案件审判程序更加严格。从目前来看,我国对于死刑案件审判程序做出了很多特殊性的规定,例如规定了死刑案件的审理期限问题,死刑复核程序等等。但是,还是存在很多有待完善的地方。例如,存在一些死刑案件证明标准过于笼统,辩护人的辩护作用难以充分发挥,死刑复核程序缺乏期限限制等缺陷与问题。同时,日本和美国是发达国家中适用死刑制度的典型代表,他们在死刑适用上的特别规定不同于我国的死刑审判程序。这些国家死刑案件的程序和制度规定对我国死刑审判程序的完善与改革具有重要的借鉴意义。我国可以在参考与借鉴美国与日本的死刑审判制度的同时,再具体地针对我国现行的有关死刑审判程序出现的问题进行完善。本文一共分为五大部分,第一部分是对完善我国死刑审判程序的必要性予以了详述,第二部分主要阐述了我国死刑案件审判程序的特别性要求,第三部分重点剖析了我国现行死刑案件审判制度在各个方面出现的各种缺陷和矛盾,第四部分简单介绍了国外相类似的制度,第五部分与第三部分相呼应,主要是为第三部分当中提出的各种问题寻找切实可行的解决方法,为我国死刑案件审判程序的完善寻找思路,并从各个方面为我国公安司法机关相关工作的改进提出了对策和建议。
[Abstract]:Death penalty is one of the most severe ways to punish crime. The application of death penalty is related to human life. Therefore, the death penalty system, China has taken a very cautious attitude. Because of the particularity of death penalty cases, the rules of trial procedure of death penalty cases in our country are more strict than those of ordinary criminal cases. From the current point of view, our country has made a lot of special provisions for the trial procedure of death penalty cases, such as the time limit of the death penalty cases, the death penalty review procedures and so on. However, there are still many areas to be improved. For example, there are some defects and problems such as the standard of proof of death penalty cases is too general, the defense function of the defender is difficult to give full play, the death penalty review procedure lacks the limitation of time limit and so on. At the same time, Japan and the United States are typical representatives of the application of the death penalty in developed countries, their special provisions in the application of the death penalty are different from the death penalty procedure in our country. The procedure and system provisions of death penalty cases in these countries are of great significance to the perfection and reform of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. Our country can refer to and draw lessons from the death penalty trial system of the United States and Japan, and at the same time, concretely aim at the problems of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. This paper is divided into five parts altogether. The first part is about the necessity of perfecting the death penalty trial procedure in our country. The second part mainly expounds the special requirements of the death penalty trial procedure in our country. The third part focuses on the analysis of the current death penalty trial system in China in various aspects of the defects and contradictions, the fourth part of a brief introduction of similar systems abroad, the fifth part and the third part echo. The main purpose is to find practical solutions to the various problems raised in the third part, and to find a way of thinking for the perfection of the trial procedures of death penalty cases in our country. The countermeasures and suggestions are put forward for the improvement of the relevant work of the public security and judicial organs in China from various aspects.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】