诉讼外和解的实体法基

发布时间：2019-01-05 03:55

【摘要】：诉讼外和解与生效判决的关系,是吴梅案的核心问题。现有研究集中于诉讼法层面,莫衷一是,主要是忽视了吴梅案涉及的若干实体法问题所致。在实体法上,吴梅案及2007年《民事诉讼法》第207条第2款的理论基础是:债务不履行催生合同解除权,和解协议因解除而失效,双方实体法律关系回到生效判决所确认的状态。故生效判决的执行或恢复执行,应以和解协议是否因解除、撤销等原因而失效作为判断标准,并顾及和解协议的特性。这对于2012年《民事诉讼法》第230条第2款同样适用。目前以诚信原则作为执行或恢复执行生效判决的判断标准的做法,只能实现粗犷的正义,且包含一定的误会,应予放弃;但诚信原则仍可以用于限制解除权等合同权利的滥用,从而间接影响和解协议的效力。
[Abstract]:The relationship between settlement outside litigation and effective judgment is the core issue of Wu Mei case. The present research focuses on the procedural law, which is mainly due to the neglect of some substantive law problems involved in Wu Mei's case. In substantive law, the theoretical basis of Wu Mei's case and Article 207 (2) of the Civil procedure Law in 2007 is: the non-performance of debt gives birth to the right to rescind the contract, the settlement agreement is invalidated by the dissolution, and the legal relationship between the two parties returns to the state confirmed by the effective judgment. Therefore, the execution of effective judgment or resumption of execution should be judged by whether the settlement agreement is invalidated because of rescission or revocation, and the characteristics of the settlement agreement should be taken into account. This also applies to article 230, paragraph 2, of the 2012 Code of Civil procedure. At present, the practice of using the principle of good faith as the judgment standard of executing or resuming the execution of the effective judgment can only achieve rough justice, and contain certain misunderstanding, which should be abandoned; However, the principle of good faith can still be used to limit the abuse of contractual rights such as the right of rescission, thus indirectly affecting the validity of the settlement agreement.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：2010年度国家社科基金重大项目“中国特色判例制度研究”(批准号:10zd&044)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1;D923

【参考文献】