言词证据如何得到辩护

发布时间：2019-01-05 04:37

【摘要】：言词证据是他人经验的语言流传物,诉讼需要解决言词证据如何得到辩护的问题。现有的还原论和反还原论理论都无法实现对言词证据的有效辩护,言词证据的辩护理论需要实现向非形式逻辑理论范式、方法的转变。借助于论证型式对言词证据进行辩护,符合人类思维方式,具体化、情景化或合情的论证型式,使得对言词证据的辩护有模式理路可循;再者,论证型式以批判性问题作为评估方法,通过批判性思维来检验言词证据的可靠性是有效的。在法庭论辩中,要对言辞证据的辩护过程加以限定,语用论辩规则对证据的可靠性采用了一种新的观察视角,在质证过程中,语用论辩规则要转变为具体的程序规则。言词证据的运用应遵循直接言辞规则、防守义务规则、非法言词证据排除规则、关联性规则和融贯性规则。
[Abstract]:Verbal evidence is the language of the experience of others, litigation needs to solve the problem of how to defend the verbal evidence. The existing theories of reductionism and anti-reductionism can not effectively defend the verbal evidence. The defense theory of verbal evidence needs to change to the paradigm and method of non-formal logic theory. With the help of the argumentation type to defend the verbal evidence, it accords with the human thinking mode, concretization, situational or reasonable argumentation pattern, which makes the defense of the verbal evidence have the pattern to follow; Furthermore, it is effective to test the reliability of verbal evidence by critical thinking. In court debate, we should limit the defense process of verbal evidence. Pragmatic argumentation rules adopt a new perspective on the reliability of evidence. In the process of cross-examination, pragmatic argumentation rules should be transformed into concrete procedural rules. The use of verbal evidence should follow the rules of direct speech, defense duty, illegal verbal evidence exclusion, relevance and consistency.
【作者单位】：中国计量大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：2015年度国家社科基金重点项目“法律论证逻辑研究——面向‘法治中国’建设的整合性和应用性研究”(15AZX019)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】