当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

认罪认罚从宽制度的地方样本阐释——L、S、H三个区速裁试点规则的分析

发布时间:2019-01-08 10:19
【摘要】:速裁程序试点是我国进一步推进认罪认罚从宽制度的经验基础。我国刑事速裁程序的试点背景可归结为"普通程序趋于正当化,挤占司法资源"、"简易程序适用范围增加,导致简者不简"、"刑法典新一轮修正,导致刑法圈扩张",以及"后劳动教养时代的司法圈拓展"四个方面。在司法实务中,我国地方性刑事司法规则表明基层试点的速裁程序在启动要件、运行流程、权利保障等环节具有多元复杂性的特质,进步与局限共存。从中长期讲,如何避免因过度简化而导致程序不公,有赖于一系列配套机制的完善,如注意区分公安机关的合理取证与非法诱供行为,完善当事人和解和审前社会调查制度,推行更精密化的量刑建议实践。
[Abstract]:The trial of quick adjudication procedure is the empirical basis of further advancing the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing in our country. The trial background of criminal quick adjudication procedure in our country can be summed up as follows: "the ordinary procedure tends to be justified and diverts the judicial resources", "the scope of application of the summary procedure increases, which leads to the simplification of the criminal code", "the new round of amendment of the Criminal Code leads to the expansion of the criminal law circle". And the four aspects of judicial circle expansion in the post-reeducation-through-labor era. In the judicial practice, the local criminal judicial rules of our country indicate that the quick adjudication procedure of the grass-roots pilot unit has the characteristics of multiple complexity in the starting elements, the running process, the right guarantee and so on, and the progress and limitation coexist. In the medium and long term, how to avoid procedural injustice caused by excessive simplification depends on the perfection of a series of supporting mechanisms, such as paying attention to distinguishing reasonable evidence collection and illegal inducement of public security organs, perfecting the system of party reconciliation and pre-trial social investigation. Carry out more sophisticated practice of sentencing advice.
【作者单位】: 上海交通大学凯原法学院;
【基金】:上海交通大学晨星学者奖励计划资助
【分类号】:D925.2


本文编号:2404472

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2404472.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6d752***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com