行政机关负责人出庭应诉保障机制研究
[Abstract]:As the new Administrative procedure Law came into effect on May 1, 2015, the system of administrative organ chief appearing in court came into effect in the whole country. The system was first put forward and implemented in Heyang County, Shaanxi Province. The system is conducive to resolving the current problems such as difficult administrative trial. Therefore, this paper mainly analyzes the system of the chief of administrative organs appearing in court, analyzes the problems existing in the judicial practice, and then finds out the causes of these problems and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. In addition, through the analysis of the current situation of the judicial practice of the system of chief executives appearing in court, the author tries to construct a suitable safeguard mechanism to promote the implementation of the system better. Play its due role in the process of legal system construction in our country. This paper is mainly composed of four parts. The following is a brief introduction to each part: the first part of this paper is based on the related concepts of the system of responsible persons of administrative organs appearing in court. Through understanding and grasping the related concepts, this paper analyzes the value of the system of chief executives appearing in court. This article plays a leading role in the post-narration. The second part of this paper briefly expounds the emergence and development of the system of the chief of administrative organs appearing in court, the specific provisions of the system of the chief of administrative organs appearing in court in the legislation and the present situation of its implementation in the judicial practice. From this part, we can see that the system of chief executives of administrative organs appearing in court is a system that emerges from the bottom-up and slowly advancing, that is, it is first explored and groped by various localities, and then, to a certain extent, the State Council and the Supreme Law promulgate a unified document. Systems in operation in various localities; By introducing the present situation of the implementation of this system in judicial practice, we know that the implementation of this system in judicial practice is not good, but we still need to improve and strengthen it. The third part of this paper is based on the second part to further explore the administrative organs in the system of appearance in court in the process of judicial practice problems, and from different levels to think about the causes of these problems. The fourth part of this article is based on the second part and the third part of the elaboration as the premise, respectively from the internal system, the court system and the news media level to the administrative organ responsible person appears in the lawsuit system to put forward own point of view. To improve the system to their own little bit of power.
【学位授予单位】:甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张双山;杨美安;唐真兴;;出庭应诉 城口县长敢于“吃螃蟹”[J];公民导刊;2008年10期
2 张育仁;;让官员出庭应诉成为法治社会常态[J];公民导刊;2014年06期
3 阳明武;行政首长出庭应诉的意义[J];政府法制;2003年21期
4 一孔;;云南首例一把手出庭应诉案原告败诉[J];法制与经济(上半月);2008年05期
5 许圣荣;倪恩良;季宏;;行政首长出庭应诉的实践与探索[J];中国工商管理研究;2008年12期
6 王应强;;论建立行政首长出庭应诉制度[J];学习论坛;2008年04期
7 贺冠斐;;构建行政首长出庭应诉制度管见[J];南阳师范学院学报;2008年04期
8 ;江苏 国土资源厅领导首次出庭应诉[J];资源与人居环境;2008年12期
9 卢国伟;赵会平;;河南南阳推行行政首长出庭应诉制度[J];中国审判;2008年07期
10 姜忠惠;姜福信;王喜英;;水行政机关出庭应诉要点[J];黑龙江水利科技;2009年03期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 黎军;杨惠宇;;制度设计与制度实践——行政首长出庭应诉的实证研究[A];全国法院第25届学术讨论会获奖论文集:公正司法与行政法实施问题研究(下册)[C];2013年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 柏佳春 龚永泉;南通推行行政负责人出庭应诉制度[N];人民日报;2007年
2 《中国司法》副总编辑 刘武俊;“一把手”出庭应诉亟需制度化[N];法制日报;2008年
3 记者 卫建萍 通讯员 董燕静;积极倡导行政领导出庭应诉[N];人民法院报;2009年
4 记者 付洪军 见习记者 胡细莺;“民告官”一把手须出庭应诉[N];珠海特区报;2009年
5 记者 何清平;“逼”行政一把手出庭应诉[N];重庆日报;2010年
6 魏文彪;局长出庭应诉 扯不上“人人平等”[N];检察日报;2004年
7 刘武俊;一把手出庭应诉倒逼依法行政[N];福建日报;2011年
8 本报记者 裴智勇;江苏海安7年206位行政领导出庭应诉[N];人民日报;2011年
9 记者 张宽明 通讯员 顾成勇;江苏海安县长出庭应诉“民告官”案[N];人民法院报;2012年
10 海门市悦来镇政府 洪玲艳;县长出庭应诉的标本意义[N];南通日报;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 张怡晴;行政首长出庭应诉制度的理性认识[D];中国青年政治学院;2014年
2 孟静;延边地区行政机关负责人出庭应诉形式化现象探究[D];延边大学;2016年
3 宋旭;论行政诉讼被告负责人出庭应诉制度[D];湘潭大学;2016年
4 王雪;S县行政首长出庭应诉情况调研报告[D];辽宁大学;2016年
5 谢丽华;行政机关负责人出庭应诉制度研究[D];广西民族大学;2016年
6 陈玉香;我国行政机关负责人出庭应诉制度研究[D];新疆大学;2017年
7 徐梦,
本文编号:2404903
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2404903.html