台湾地区刑事妥速审判法之检思
发布时间：2019-02-10 19:25
【摘要】：我国台湾地区刑事妥速审判法首次以立法的形式赋予刑事被告妥速审判权。从法律规定及适用的情况看,"速审法"的主要进步在于:提高了民众的速审权意识,限制了未决羁押的期限,治理诉讼迟延初具成效;但同时存在以下问题:治理方向避重就轻,保护范围狭窄,忽略侵害速审权关键因素,"减刑救济"的认定和适用存在争议,"限制上诉"措施不当地剥夺了检察官的上诉权。台湾地区刑事妥速审判法的进步与不足启发我们:应将迅速审判权作为被追诉人的诉讼权利,尽可能解决我国刑事诉讼中妨碍迅速审判的各类问题,合理界定速审权的适用期间,建立合理的审查标准,建立多元的速审权救济体系。
[Abstract]:For the first time, the criminal trial law in Taiwan gives the criminal defendant the right of trial in due course by way of legislation. From the legal provisions and the application of the situation, the main progress of the "Quick trial Law" lies in: to improve the awareness of the people's right to speedy trial, to limit the time limit of pending custody, and to deal with the delay in litigation with initial results; But at the same time, there are the following problems: the direction of governance, the narrow scope of protection, the neglect of the key factors of infringement of the right of quick trial, the controversy of the confirmation and application of the "commutation relief", and the improper deprivation of the prosecutor's right of appeal by the measures of "limited appeal". The progress and deficiency of the criminal law in Taiwan enlighten us: we should regard the right of prompt trial as the litigant's right of prosecution, and solve as far as possible all kinds of problems that hinder the speedy trial in criminal proceedings in our country. Define the applicable period of the right of quick trial reasonably, establish reasonable standard of examination and establish multiple relief system of the right of quick trial.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：中国法学会部级课题一般项目“推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革”(CLS(2015)C06),负责人卢君
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2419465
[Abstract]:For the first time, the criminal trial law in Taiwan gives the criminal defendant the right of trial in due course by way of legislation. From the legal provisions and the application of the situation, the main progress of the "Quick trial Law" lies in: to improve the awareness of the people's right to speedy trial, to limit the time limit of pending custody, and to deal with the delay in litigation with initial results; But at the same time, there are the following problems: the direction of governance, the narrow scope of protection, the neglect of the key factors of infringement of the right of quick trial, the controversy of the confirmation and application of the "commutation relief", and the improper deprivation of the prosecutor's right of appeal by the measures of "limited appeal". The progress and deficiency of the criminal law in Taiwan enlighten us: we should regard the right of prompt trial as the litigant's right of prosecution, and solve as far as possible all kinds of problems that hinder the speedy trial in criminal proceedings in our country. Define the applicable period of the right of quick trial reasonably, establish reasonable standard of examination and establish multiple relief system of the right of quick trial.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：中国法学会部级课题一般项目“推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革”(CLS(2015)C06),负责人卢君
【分类号】：D925.2
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 陈光中;;建设公正高效权威的社会主义司法制度之我见[J];人民检察;2009年04期
2 顾永忠;;1997-2008年我国刑事诉讼整体运行情况的考察分析——以程序分流为视角[J];人民检察;2010年08期
3 叶肖华;;论刑事审判程序分流[J];苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年05期
4 王永杰;朱晋峰;;“司法实体公正与程序公正的冲突与衡平”研讨会简讯[J];探索与争鸣;2011年11期
，本文编号：2419465
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2419465.html
