犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权研究

发布时间：2019-02-19 18:57

【摘要】：现代法治国家越来越重视犯罪嫌疑人的主体性地位,在刑事诉讼的过程中充分保障其知情权和诉讼参与权,以期实现控辩平等和程序公正。犯罪嫌疑人是指因涉嫌犯罪而受到刑事追诉的人,在检察机关向法院对其提起公诉以前的称谓,即侦查和审查起诉阶段对涉嫌犯罪的当事人的称谓。本论文通过引入社会学中的角色期望理论,分析赋予犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权的法理基础,重新定义权属回归后阅卷权的内涵。在对我国赋予犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权的诉讼价值分析基础上,考察大陆法系国家的阅卷权制度和英美法系国家的证据开示制度,结合我国的实际情况,构建我国犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权制度。第一章,从社会学视野下的刑事诉讼角色理论切入,指出公检法机关在刑事诉讼的过程中存在角色冲突和失调,阅卷权的法理基础是控辩平等理论和程序主体性理论。犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权权属理应回归其本质,在侦查阶段和审查起诉阶段犯罪嫌疑人享有有限度阅卷的权利,即检阅卷宗材料及物证等证据的权利。第二章,赋予犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权具有重要的诉讼价值,主要表现在三个方面：实现有效辩护的前提、预防冤家错案的手段、保障犯罪嫌疑人主体性地位的需要。通过分析赋予犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权的诉讼价值,指出赋予犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权的正当性和必要性。第三章,通过考察大陆法系国家的阅卷权制度和英美法系国家的证据开示制度,为我国的犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权制度构建提供借鉴。在现有理论和经验的前提下,结合我国的社会环境和立法现状逐步构建我国的犯罪嫌疑人阅卷制度。第四章,赋予犯罪嫌疑人阅卷权具有重要的意义,笔者提出在以下几个方面构建符合我国国情的犯罪嫌疑人阅卷制度：阅卷的时间和范围、阅卷的地点和方式、侵犯阅卷权的救济。
[Abstract]:Modern countries under the rule of law pay more and more attention to the subjective status of criminal suspects and fully guarantee their right to know and participate in proceedings in the process of criminal proceedings in order to achieve equality of prosecution and defense and procedural justice. A criminal suspect is a person who is prosecuted by a criminal for a suspected crime, which is the appellation of the party involved in the suspected crime in the stage of investigation and prosecution before the prosecution is brought to the court by the procuratorial organ. By introducing the theory of role expectation in sociology, this paper analyzes the legal basis of giving criminal suspects the right to read papers, and redefines the connotation of the right of marking after the return of ownership. Based on the analysis of the lawsuit value of the criminal suspect's marking right, this paper investigates the system of the marking right in the countries of the continental law system and the evidence discovery system in the countries of the common law system, and combines the actual situation of our country. Construct the criminal suspect marking right system in our country. In the first chapter, from the perspective of sociology, the author points out that the public security bureau, procuratorate and court organs have conflicts and misalignments in the process of criminal proceedings. The legal basis of the marking right is the theory of equality of prosecution and defense and the theory of procedural subjectivity. The right of criminal suspect's marking right should return to its essence. In the stage of investigation and prosecution, the criminal suspect has the right of limited examination, that is, the right to review the documents and material evidence and other evidence. In the second chapter, giving the criminal suspect the right to read papers has important litigation value, mainly in three aspects: the premise of effective defense, the means of preventing the wrong case of the enemy, and the need to protect the subjective position of the criminal suspect. By analyzing the lawsuit value of giving the criminal suspect the right to read papers, the author points out the legitimacy and necessity of giving the criminal suspect the right to read the paper. The third chapter, through the examination of the civil law system and the common law system of evidence discovery system, for our criminal suspects to read the system of reference. Under the premise of existing theory and experience, combining with the social environment and the current legislative situation of our country, the criminal suspect marking system of our country is constructed step by step. In the fourth chapter, it is of great significance to give the criminal suspect the right to mark the papers. The author puts forward the following aspects: the time and scope of the marking, the place and the way of the marking, and the construction of the system of the marking of the criminal suspect in the following aspects. Relief for infringement of the right to read papers
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】