“以审判为中心”背景下的认罪认罚从宽制度解读与完善
发布时间：2019-03-05 13:17
【摘要】：党的十八届四中全会提出了"以审判为中心"的诉讼制度改革和完善认罪认罚从宽制度两大改革主张。从外在表现形式上看,两者似乎存在冲突,但是仔细分析后可知,两者在追求公正的内在价值上是一致的。认罪认罚从宽制度从制度上保障了"以审判为中心"改革的可行性,而审判中心主义又是认罪认罚从宽制度存在的正当性基础。在以审判为中心背景下,认罪认罚从宽制度中的认罪认罚协商制度、律师辩护制度、法院审查对象和过程尤其需要进一步细化和完善。
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward two reform ideas: "trial-centered" reform of the litigation system and improvement of the admission and punishment leniency system. From the external form of expression, there seems to be conflict between the two, but after careful analysis, they are consistent in the pursuit of the intrinsic value of justice. The system of pleading admission and punishment leniency guarantees the feasibility of the reform of "trial-centered", and the doctrine of trial-centralism is the legitimate basis of the existence of the system of pleading admission and punishment leniency. Under the background of trial-centered, it is especially necessary to refine and perfect the negotiation system of plea admission and punishment, the defense system of lawyers, the object and process of court review in the system of plea admission and punishment leniency.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward two reform ideas: "trial-centered" reform of the litigation system and improvement of the admission and punishment leniency system. From the external form of expression, there seems to be conflict between the two, but after careful analysis, they are consistent in the pursuit of the intrinsic value of justice. The system of pleading admission and punishment leniency guarantees the feasibility of the reform of "trial-centered", and the doctrine of trial-centralism is the legitimate basis of the existence of the system of pleading admission and punishment leniency. Under the background of trial-centered, it is especially necessary to refine and perfect the negotiation system of plea admission and punishment, the defense system of lawyers, the object and process of court review in the system of plea admission and punishment leniency.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 顾永忠;;关于“完善认罪认罚从宽制度”的几个理论问题[J];当代法学;2016年06期
2 陈卫东;亢晶晶;;我国律师辩护保障体系的完善——以审判中心主义为视角[J];中国人民大学学报;2016年03期
3 赵恒;;刑事速裁程序试点实证研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2016年02期
4 陈卫东;;认罪认罚从宽制度研究[J];中国法学;2016年02期
5 纪艽;;浅议我国完善被告人认罪认罚从宽制度能否引进辩诉交易制度[J];法制与社会;2015年25期
6 熊秋红;;刑事简易速裁程序之权利保障与体系化建构[J];人民检察;2014年17期
7 李昌盛;;德国刑事协商制度研究[J];现代法学;2011年06期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 黄s，
本文编号：2434939
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2434939.html
