新兴隐私权纠纷的司法救济与权衡
发布时间：2019-03-17 18:58
【摘要】：在中国,隐私权的产生和发展一直都依赖司法裁判的推动。近十年来,随着信息技术的飞速发展,司法裁判中隐私侵权案件攀升,出现诸多隐私纠纷的新类型。其中,空间隐私纠纷、个人信息纠纷、网络言论侵权纠纷是此类案件中争议较大、较有代表性的类型。通过对案例样本的比较分析,可以发现这些新兴隐私权在实践中都遭遇了不同层面的利益冲突,且在立法中尚未确立统一的救济标准。立法的缺位、模糊和冲突,使司法有了更多自由裁量的空间;法官在充分审视情理、政策、社会利益后所做的判决,意图调适法律确定性和开放性之间的冲突,实则是对现实社会需要的"回应"。
[Abstract]:In China, the generation and development of the right to privacy has always depended on the promotion of judicial adjudication. In recent ten years, with the rapid development of information technology, privacy infringement cases rise in judicial adjudication, and there are many new types of privacy disputes. Among them, space privacy disputes, personal information disputes, network speech infringement disputes are more controversial in such cases, more representative types. Through the comparative analysis of case samples, it can be found that these new privacy rights in practice have encountered different levels of conflict of interest, and in the legislation has not yet established a unified standard of relief. The absence of legislation, vagueness and conflict have given the judiciary more room for discretion; The judge's judgment after fully examining the reason, the policy, the social benefit, the intention to adjust the conflict between the legal certainty and the openness, is in fact a "response" to the needs of the real society.
【作者单位】： 河南大学法学院;
【基金】：河南大学基本科研业务费科研专项基金“中国基层法官角色研究”(zzjj20140060)阶段性成果;河南大学人文社科项目“基层法官的角色行为与实践”(2012YBRW001)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1
[Abstract]:In China, the generation and development of the right to privacy has always depended on the promotion of judicial adjudication. In recent ten years, with the rapid development of information technology, privacy infringement cases rise in judicial adjudication, and there are many new types of privacy disputes. Among them, space privacy disputes, personal information disputes, network speech infringement disputes are more controversial in such cases, more representative types. Through the comparative analysis of case samples, it can be found that these new privacy rights in practice have encountered different levels of conflict of interest, and in the legislation has not yet established a unified standard of relief. The absence of legislation, vagueness and conflict have given the judiciary more room for discretion; The judge's judgment after fully examining the reason, the policy, the social benefit, the intention to adjust the conflict between the legal certainty and the openness, is in fact a "response" to the needs of the real society.
【作者单位】： 河南大学法学院;
【基金】：河南大学基本科研业务费科研专项基金“中国基层法官角色研究”(zzjj20140060)阶段性成果;河南大学人文社科项目“基层法官的角色行为与实践”(2012YBRW001)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 王利明;;论个人信息权的法律保护——以个人信息权与隐私权的界分为中心[J];现代法学;2013年04期
2 王利明;;隐私权的新发展[J];人大法律评论;2009年01期
3 王利明;;隐私权内容探讨[J];浙江社会科学;2007年03期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜婧;;信息商业化时代的个人信息权利属性及适用研究——以美国为研究视角[J];法制与社会;2017年19期
2 陈阳;;新兴隐私权纠纷的司法救济与权衡[J];河南大学学报(社会科学版);2017年04期
3 曾彩霞;尤建新;;大数据垄断对相关市场竞争的挑战与规制:基于文献的研究[J];中国价格监管与反垄断;2017年06期
4 王超迁;;个人信息法律保护的法理学分析[J];法制博览;2017年17期
5 王s，
本文编号：2442600
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2442600.html
