从试点情况看行政公益诉讼诉前程序

发布时间：2019-03-17 21:03

【摘要】：从检察机关提起行政公益诉讼试点情况看,诉前程序作用巨大,是有效结案的主要形式。诉前程序体现了司法权对行政权的尊重和自身的谦抑,有助于发挥行政机关自我纠错、主动履职的能动性,节约司法资源。要正确认识和运用诉前程序与提起诉讼的辩证关系,优化诉前程序的设计。不必纠结于诉前程序多,提起诉讼少的现象,最大限度地减少诉讼,原本就是诉前程序设计的内在逻辑。行政不作为及其法律责任是诉前程序的理论基础。诉前程序起到了将行政作为违法转化为行政不作为的作用。行政公益诉讼多重职责交错的存在使不作为的认定十分复杂,可以实质性履行为核心标准,区分不同情况具体把握。
[Abstract]:Judging from the pilot cases of administrative public interest litigation initiated by procuratorial organs, the pre-lawsuit procedure plays an important role and is the main form of effective settlement of cases. The pre-lawsuit procedure embodies the judicial power's respect for administrative power and its self-restraint, which is helpful to bring into play the initiative of administrative organs in self-correcting, actively performing their duties and saving judicial resources. In order to optimize the design of pre-lawsuit procedure, we should correctly understand and apply the dialectical relationship between the pre-lawsuit procedure and filing a lawsuit. There is no need to dwell on the phenomenon of more pre-litigation procedures and less litigation, and to minimize litigation is originally the inherent logic of pre-litigation procedure design. Administrative omission and its legal liability are the theoretical basis of the pre-litigation procedure. The pre-lawsuit procedure has the function of turning the administrative act into administrative omission. The existence of multiple responsibilities in administrative public interest litigation makes the cognizance of omission very complicated, and it can be performed as the core standard to distinguish different cases.
【作者单位】：国家检察官学院;
【基金】：中央马克思主义理论研究和建设工程重大项目兼国家社科基金重大项目“全面推进依法治国重大现实问题研究”(2015MZD042)子课题“中国特色公益诉讼制度研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】