论消费者协会公益诉讼的损害赔偿请求权——对最高人民法院司法解释立场的商榷
发布时间：2019-03-30 13:51
【摘要】：最高人民法院发布的《关于审理消费民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释》将原告可以提起的诉讼请求限定于停止侵害等不作为诉请,拒绝损害赔偿诉讼请求。这一立场值得商榷的。消费公益诉讼制度是基于弥补传统诉讼制度的不足和诉讼机制的失灵,以更好地保护消费者利益而建立的。为了有效地救济遭受损害的公共利益,借鉴吸收外国法的经验与教训,适应中国的国情,应当允许提起损害赔偿之诉,赔偿额为经营者的违法所得。最高人民法院对允许损害赔偿之诉的诸多顾虑是没有必要也不能成立的。
[Abstract]:The interpretation of the applicable Law of Consumer Civil Public interest Litigation issued by the Supreme people's Court limited plaintiff's legal claim to stop infringement and so on, and refused to claim damages. This position is debatable. The system of consumer public interest litigation is based on making up for the deficiency of traditional litigation system and the failure of litigation mechanism in order to better protect the interests of consumers. In order to effectively remedy the damaged public interests, learn from the experience and lessons of foreign laws and adapt to the national conditions of China, we should allow the prosecution of damages, and the amount of compensation shall be the illegal income of the operator. Many concerns of the Supreme people's Court about allowing damages are unnecessary and untenable.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【基金】：应飞虎教授主持的国家社科基金重大项目“民生视野下食品安全治理的法治化”(项目编号:14ZDC028)的部分研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1
本文编号：2450141
[Abstract]:The interpretation of the applicable Law of Consumer Civil Public interest Litigation issued by the Supreme people's Court limited plaintiff's legal claim to stop infringement and so on, and refused to claim damages. This position is debatable. The system of consumer public interest litigation is based on making up for the deficiency of traditional litigation system and the failure of litigation mechanism in order to better protect the interests of consumers. In order to effectively remedy the damaged public interests, learn from the experience and lessons of foreign laws and adapt to the national conditions of China, we should allow the prosecution of damages, and the amount of compensation shall be the illegal income of the operator. Many concerns of the Supreme people's Court about allowing damages are unnecessary and untenable.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【基金】：应飞虎教授主持的国家社科基金重大项目“民生视野下食品安全治理的法治化”(项目编号:14ZDC028)的部分研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 王春芳;;论刑事附带民事诉讼中被害人的精神损害赔偿请求权[J];社会科学论坛(学术研究卷);2007年06期
2 王佳;;刑事被害人物质损害赔偿请求权探讨[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2009年S1期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 任彦斌;刑事犯罪精神损害赔偿请求权研究[D];内蒙古大学;2013年
，本文编号：2450141
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2450141.html
