走向法庭还是走上街头:超越维权困境的一条行动路径

发布时间：2019-04-11 21:29

【摘要】：制度外抗争与制度内法律维权有着显著不同的结果和制度逻辑。现有文献中的"依法抗争"或"以法抗争"可以通过制度外或者制度边缘的集体行动获得政府及时的反应,但却有着多重困境:机会困境、风险困境、组织困境、制度困境。制度内法律维权可以很大程度上破解这些困境,但也有着该模式下独特的结果困境:费时费力而又缺乏即时直接的回报困扰或者阻碍制度内法律维权者去为了获得长期的有益于整个群体的普遍性制度化后果采取行动。但本研究中的业主维权行动在一定程度上破解了这一困境。他们的制度内维权行动让法律在实践中最大可能地运转了起来,从而超越了传统维权的困境。独特的政治机会结构和制度内维权本身所具有的特征,促进一些群体走向法庭,而非走上街头。
[Abstract]:There are significantly different results and institutional logic between outside-system protest and intra-institutional legal rights protection. The "legal struggle" or "legal struggle" in the existing literature can obtain the timely response of the government through collective action outside the system or on the edge of the system, but it has multiple dilemmas: opportunity dilemma, risk dilemma, organizational dilemma, and institutional dilemma. Legal rights within the system can largely solve these dilemmas, But there is also a unique outcome dilemma in this model: time-consuming and lack of immediate and direct rewards or hindrance for legal defenders in the system to act in order to achieve long-term, universal, institutionalized consequences that benefit the whole community. However, the owner's rights-defending action in this study solved this dilemma to a certain extent. Their actions of safeguarding rights within the system make the law operate as possible in practice, thus surpassing the dilemma of traditional rights protection. Unique political opportunity structures and the very characteristics of rights within the system promote groups to the courts rather than to the streets.
【作者单位】：中山大学中国公共管理研究中心、政治与公共事务管理学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大招标项目“扩大公民有序政治参与:战略;路径与对策”(基金号12&ZD040)资助~~
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】