原告对行政规范性文件的请求审查权解读
发布时间：2019-04-27 22:03
【摘要】：新《行政诉讼法》第53条确立了原告对行政规范性文件请求审查权的制度,该制度的确立一方面拓展了我国行政诉讼原告的诉权范围,对于保护公民、法人和其他社会组织的其他相关权利有积极意义;另一方面它能够有效规范行政权的行使,能够对行政权的控制从立体上展开。从更为宏观的角度来说,它是为了使我国行政法治更加理性。因此,原告这一权利的实现有着较为复杂而具体的路径,仅仅从诉权的角度或者从司法审查的角度很难将其厘清,原告对行政规范性文件的请求审查权应当通过否定被诉具体行政行为依据,判决该行政行为违法,认可司法建议权,终止违法或不当行政规范性文件等路径予以实现。
[Abstract]:Article 53 of the new Administrative procedure Law establishes the system of the plaintiff's right to request the examination of administrative normative documents. On the one hand, the establishment of this system expands the scope of the plaintiff's right of action in administrative litigation in China, and it is of great significance to the protection of citizens. Other relevant rights of legal persons and other social organizations are positive; On the other hand, it can effectively regulate the exercise of the executive power and control the executive power from a three-dimensional perspective. From a more macro point of view, it is to make our country's administrative rule of law more rational. Therefore, the realization of this right of the plaintiff has a more complex and specific path, and it is difficult to clarify it only from the perspective of the right of action or from the angle of judicial review. The plaintiff's right to request for examination of administrative normative documents should be realized by denying the basis of the specific administrative act being sued, judging that the administrative act is illegal, recognizing the right of judicial proposal, and terminating the illegal or improper administrative normative document.
【作者单位】： 上海财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目:(13BFX040)无效行政行为的判定标准及司法审查研究
【分类号】：D925.3
本文编号：2467343
[Abstract]:Article 53 of the new Administrative procedure Law establishes the system of the plaintiff's right to request the examination of administrative normative documents. On the one hand, the establishment of this system expands the scope of the plaintiff's right of action in administrative litigation in China, and it is of great significance to the protection of citizens. Other relevant rights of legal persons and other social organizations are positive; On the other hand, it can effectively regulate the exercise of the executive power and control the executive power from a three-dimensional perspective. From a more macro point of view, it is to make our country's administrative rule of law more rational. Therefore, the realization of this right of the plaintiff has a more complex and specific path, and it is difficult to clarify it only from the perspective of the right of action or from the angle of judicial review. The plaintiff's right to request for examination of administrative normative documents should be realized by denying the basis of the specific administrative act being sued, judging that the administrative act is illegal, recognizing the right of judicial proposal, and terminating the illegal or improper administrative normative document.
【作者单位】： 上海财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目:(13BFX040)无效行政行为的判定标准及司法审查研究
【分类号】：D925.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 陈丽芳;;行政规范性文件的法律地位分析[J];党政论坛;2007年04期
2 张率;;行政规范性文件司法监督研究[J];中共石家庄市委党校学报;2006年05期
3 王鹏;;论行政规范性文件在我国行政诉讼中的地位[J];淮南师范学院学报;2010年01期
4 小时;行政规范性文件在行政审判中的地位和作用[J];法学天地;1997年06期
5 陈高英;试论行政规范性文件的司法审查[J];福州党校学报;2002年03期
6 邱继伟;;论制定行政规范性文件之行为属性[J];行政与法;2007年09期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 阮莹;椒江:审判白皮书的蝴蝶效应[N];人民法院报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 刘锦璇;我国行政规范性文件可诉性研究[D];兰州大学;2015年
2 张维;行政规范性文件司法审查制度研究[D];北京交通大学;2016年
3 韩冰洁;行政规范性文件附带司法审查制度研究[D];上海师范大学;2016年
4 刘芳芳;人民法院审查行政规范性文件的实证研究[D];贵州民族大学;2016年
5 李健康;行政规范性文件司法审查问题研究[D];西北大学;2016年
6 李福艳;我国行政规范性文件在司法领域的效力研究[D];青岛大学;2014年
，本文编号：2467343
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2467343.html
