王某某诉温州交警支队行政违法案分析

发布时间：2019-05-07 18:26

【摘要】：王阿兰诉温州市交警支队行政违法一案,经过浙江省多级人民法院的多次审理,前后历时两年零七个月,在社会上引起了重大反响。本文通过对双方当事人的答辩理由及法院的审判结果进行分析,提炼出本案所涉及的法律关系,明确其争议焦点。通过对争议焦点的分析,来厘清交警设卡检查违法车辆并强行拦截行为的法律属性及内部规范性文件的法律效力。交警设卡检查违法车辆并强行拦截行为成为该案争议焦点的表象是该行为是行政检查行为抑或行政事实行为,而其根源应在于我国行政诉讼受案范围的立法模式。文章通过对争议焦点的分析并结合《行政诉讼法》相关修订之处,对我国行政诉讼受案范围及内部规范性文件的完善提出一些建议。本文分为四个部分。第一部分,介绍了本案发生时的基本情况及法院的审理理由和结果,并归纳了本案的争议焦点。第二部分,通过对交警检查违法车辆并强行拦截的行为在行政诉讼领域可获得救济途径的研究,分析了温州市鹿城区法院将该行为作为行政赔偿诉讼的受案范围予以受理,而温州市中院将其界定为行政事实行为和浙江省高院将其认定为行政检查行为,通过行政诉讼的途径来对王阿兰进行救济的根源。通过对行政检查行为和行政事实行为之间的区别和联系,分析了程序性权利义务在行政法上所具有的价值。第三部分,明确了其他规范性文件的涵义,并根据其作用对象及法律效力将其划分为内部规范性文件和外部规范性文件。内部规范性文件一般只对行政机关及其工作人员发生效力,但是平等原则或行政信赖保护原则的适用,使得仅约束行政机关及其工作人员的内部规范性文件会产生对外的法律效力,如果该规范性文件合法有效的话,则可以作为法院对行政行为合法性审查的依据。根据《交通警察道路执勤执法工作规范》作用的对象及其法律效力,该规范属于内部规范性文件。本文论证了《交通警察道路执勤执法规范》是否合法有效,并通过平等原则或信赖保护原则的适用条件进一步分析该规范性文件在本案中是否产生了外部化效力,是否能够作为法院审查温州市交警支队检查违法车辆并强行拦截行为合法性的依据。第四部分,在新修订的《行政诉讼法》的基础上,对我国行政诉讼受案范围及内部规范性文件法律效力的完善,提出了一些在司法实践中切实可行的措施。
[Abstract]:Wang Alan v. Wenzhou traffic police detachment administrative violation case, after several trials by the Zhejiang Provincial multilevel people's Court, lasted two years and seven months, causing great social repercussions. Based on the analysis of the defense reasons of both parties and the trial results of the court, this paper extracts the legal relationship involved in the case and clarifies the focus of the dispute. Through the analysis of the focus of disputes, this paper clarifies the legal attributes of traffic police card checking illegal vehicles and forcibly intercepting them and the legal effect of internal normative documents. The behavior of traffic police checking illegal vehicles and blocking them by force has become the focus of controversy in this case. The appearance of the behavior is whether the behavior is administrative inspection or administrative fact, and its root should lie in the legislative mode of accepting cases in administrative litigation in our country. By analyzing the focus of disputes and combining with the relevant amendments of the Administrative procedure Law, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the scope of accepting cases and the perfection of internal normative documents in administrative litigation in China. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the basic situation of the case, the reasons and results of the court hearing, and sums up the controversial focus of the case. In the second part, through the study of the ways that the traffic police can obtain relief in the administrative litigation field by checking illegal vehicles and forcibly intercepting them, the author analyzes that the Lucheng District Court of Wenzhou City accepts the behavior as the scope of accepting the administrative compensation lawsuit. The Wenzhou Intermediate people's Court defined it as the administrative factual act and the Zhejiang Provincial High Court identified it as the administrative inspection act, and through the way of administrative litigation to remedy Wang Alan. This paper analyzes the value of procedural rights and obligations in administrative law through the distinction and connection between administrative inspection act and administrative factual act. The third part clarifies the meaning of other normative documents and divides them into internal normative documents and external normative documents according to their objects and legal effects. Internal normative documents generally apply only to administrative organs and their staff, but the principle of equality or the protection of administrative trust applies, The internal normative documents that only restrict the administrative organs and their staff will have external legal effect. If the normative documents are valid, they can be used as the basis for the court to examine the legality of administrative acts. According to the object and legal effect of Traffic Police Road Law Enforcement Standard, it belongs to the internal normative document. This paper demonstrates whether the "Traffic Police Road Enforcement Code" is legal and effective, and further analyzes whether the normative document has externalized effect in this case by means of the principle of equality or the applicable conditions of the principle of trust protection. Whether the court can examine Wenzhou traffic police detachment to inspect illegal vehicles and forcefully intercept the legality of the act. The fourth part, on the basis of the newly revised Administrative procedure Law, puts forward some feasible measures in judicial practice to improve the scope of accepting cases and the legal effect of internal normative documents in administrative litigation in China.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】