调解前置:多元化纠纷解决机制的优化路径选择

发布时间：2019-05-07 13:52

【摘要】：以法院为主导、社会各方力量参与的多元化纠纷解决机制强调充分发挥社会解决纠纷矛盾的力量,就必然要求进一步发挥调解的作用,将更多来自社会的矛盾在社会中得到解决。我国民事诉讼中的调解制度在民事纠纷的解决上发挥了重要作用,也在开庭前有效化解了一部分矛盾,但主要的调解工作依然是由人民法院成立专门的调解部门去进行,无形中也加重了地方法院的工作压力。而调解前置程序不仅可以充分发挥调解的解纷作用,还能有效减轻法院的案件压力、减少当事人的诉讼成本、促进民间调解机构的发展,也有利于增强法院的权威性。因此,我国有必要逐步建立起真正的调解前置程序,由法律对调解前置程序的受案范围、调解机构与调解人员的资质认定及调解协议的结果与效力方面均作出明确的规定,以使其具有可操作性。
[Abstract]:The pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism, led by the court and with the participation of all the forces of the society, emphasizes the full use of the social power of resolving disputes and contradictions, and it is inevitable that the role of mediation should be further brought into play. More contradictions from society will be resolved in society. The mediation system in civil litigation in our country has played an important role in the settlement of civil disputes, and has effectively resolved some contradictions before the hearing, but the main mediation work is still carried out by the people's court establishing a special mediation department. It also adds to the pressure on the local courts. The mediation pre-procedure can not only give full play to the role of mediation in resolving disputes, but also effectively reduce the pressure of court cases, reduce the litigation costs of the parties, promote the development of civil mediation institutions, and also help to enhance the authority of the court. Therefore, it is necessary for our country to establish a real mediation pre-procedure step by step, by law to make clear provisions on the scope of acceptance of mediation pre-procedure, the qualification identification of mediation institutions and mediators, and the results and effectiveness of mediation agreements. To make it operational.
【作者单位】：延边大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.14

【相似文献】