贿赂犯罪“欺骗”审讯的问题反思与改进路径

发布时间：2019-05-14 22:44

【摘要】：在我国,"欺骗"审讯一直处于比较尴尬的境地:立法"犹豫不决"、侦查"或缺或滥"、审判"几无认定非法"等。但在以"心理操纵"为基础的现代审讯中,"欺骗"是一种必要的"道德失范",它迎合了有效惩治犯罪、实现实体正义的侦查讯问价值,符合"小恶制大恶"的功利主义判断准则,备受古今中外审讯实践的欢迎。"欺骗"审讯并非无底线一律合法,合法的"欺骗"审讯必须不违背被讯问人的"自由意志",保证被讯问人供述的真实性,在个案运用中应把握合理的限度--不得已而为之、恰到好处。此外,立法应严禁诸如非法的允诺性欺骗、超越道德底线的欺骗及导致虚假供述的欺骗等。
[Abstract]:In our country, the trial of "deceit" has always been in an awkward position: legislation "hesitant", investigation "or lack or abuse", trial "hardly found illegal" and so on. However, in the modern trial based on "psychological manipulation", "deception" is a necessary "moral anomaly", which caters to the value of effective punishment of crime and the realization of substantive justice. It conforms to the utilitarian judgment criterion of "small evil and great evil" and is welcomed by the trial practice at all times and in all over the world. " Deceit "trial is not always legal without a bottom line. A legitimate" deceptive "trial must not violate the" free will "of the person questioned, ensure the authenticity of the confession of the person questioned, and grasp a reasonable limit in the application of the case, which must be done as a last resort. be just perfect銆，

本文编号：2477103