从perfect 10v. Google案看临时禁令申请中的利益衡量——兼评我国《民事诉讼法修正案》第21条之规定
发布时间：2019-06-11 23:08
【摘要】：2012年《民事诉讼法修正案》第21条增加了诉讼中临时阻断侵害行为的规定。但是,仅仅因为一方的行为给另一方造成损害就准予保全的规定容易导致制度被滥用。立法应当充分认识到不同保全制度的特性以及它们给当事人带来的影响,在此基础上设置不同的审查机制。有关诉讼中临时阻断侵害行为的保全命令,只能在对申请人、被申请人和公共利益等各方利益进行权衡之后才能做出。
[Abstract]:Article 21 of the 2012 Amendment to the Civil procedure Law added provisions for temporary blocking of violations in proceedings. However, the requirement that preservation is granted simply because one party's actions cause harm to the other can easily lead to abuse of the system. Legislation should fully recognize the characteristics of different preservation systems and their impact on the parties, on the basis of which different review mechanisms should be set up. The preservation order of temporary blocking infringement in litigation can only be made after weighing the interests of the applicant, the respondent and the public interest.
【作者单位】： 天津师范大学;
【分类号】：D925.1
[Abstract]:Article 21 of the 2012 Amendment to the Civil procedure Law added provisions for temporary blocking of violations in proceedings. However, the requirement that preservation is granted simply because one party's actions cause harm to the other can easily lead to abuse of the system. Legislation should fully recognize the characteristics of different preservation systems and their impact on the parties, on the basis of which different review mechanisms should be set up. The preservation order of temporary blocking infringement in litigation can only be made after weighing the interests of the applicant, the respondent and the public interest.
【作者单位】： 天津师范大学;
【分类号】：D925.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈莹;;我国行为保全制度的建构[J];厦门大学法律评论;2006年01期
2 郭小冬;;论诉讼保全中的利益权衡问题[J];西南政法大学学报;2009年06期
3 赫U，
本文编号：2497529
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2497529.html
