职务犯罪初查侦查化问题的法理探讨及规范路径
发布时间：2019-06-16 18:04
【摘要】：在职务犯罪的初查过程中,侦查机关常常突破初查权的运行边界,使初查行为出现侦查化的倾向。这一程序异化的现象不仅导致侦查权力的滥用并危及公民的合法权益,而且使得立案后侦查权虚置。同时由于违法取证而动摇了证据的证据能力,不利于追诉和打击犯罪。初查侦查化现象的发生是由于初查的法律性质定位不明、立案标准的"虚高"与初查措施的有限性之间的矛盾,以及没有厘清初查与侦查的逻辑关系等方面的原因。为杜绝初查侦查化现象,从程序设计的维度,采取重构初查证明标准、将初查证据纳入非法证据排除范围的措施;从制度构建的维度,采取完善初查的法律责任制度、建立初查救济机制的措施,以规范初查程序的有序运行。
[Abstract]:In the process of preliminary investigation of job-related crimes, the investigation organs often break through the operation boundary of the preliminary investigation power, so that the preliminary investigation behavior tends to be investigated. This phenomenon of procedural alienation not only leads to the abuse of investigation power and endangers the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, but also makes the investigation power false after filing a case. At the same time, because of illegal evidence collection, it shakes the evidence ability of evidence, which is not conducive to prosecution and fight against crime. The occurrence of the phenomenon of preliminary investigation is due to the unclear legal nature of the preliminary investigation, the contradiction between the "false height" of the filing standard and the limitation of the preliminary investigation measures, and the failure to clarify the logical relationship between the preliminary investigation and the investigation. In order to put an end to the phenomenon of preliminary investigation and investigation, from the dimension of program design, measures are taken to reconstruct the standard of proof of preliminary investigation and bring the evidence of preliminary investigation into the scope of exclusion of illegal evidence, and from the dimension of system construction, the measures of perfecting the legal liability system of preliminary investigation and establishing the relief mechanism of preliminary investigation are taken to standardize the orderly operation of preliminary investigation procedure.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“刑事诉讼法解释学的原理及运用研究”(项目编号:14AFX014)
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2500715
[Abstract]:In the process of preliminary investigation of job-related crimes, the investigation organs often break through the operation boundary of the preliminary investigation power, so that the preliminary investigation behavior tends to be investigated. This phenomenon of procedural alienation not only leads to the abuse of investigation power and endangers the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, but also makes the investigation power false after filing a case. At the same time, because of illegal evidence collection, it shakes the evidence ability of evidence, which is not conducive to prosecution and fight against crime. The occurrence of the phenomenon of preliminary investigation is due to the unclear legal nature of the preliminary investigation, the contradiction between the "false height" of the filing standard and the limitation of the preliminary investigation measures, and the failure to clarify the logical relationship between the preliminary investigation and the investigation. In order to put an end to the phenomenon of preliminary investigation and investigation, from the dimension of program design, measures are taken to reconstruct the standard of proof of preliminary investigation and bring the evidence of preliminary investigation into the scope of exclusion of illegal evidence, and from the dimension of system construction, the measures of perfecting the legal liability system of preliminary investigation and establishing the relief mechanism of preliminary investigation are taken to standardize the orderly operation of preliminary investigation procedure.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学刑事司法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“刑事诉讼法解释学的原理及运用研究”(项目编号:14AFX014)
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈冬;;改革我国刑事立案标准问题的探讨[J];中国刑事法杂志;2011年08期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 陈瑞华;刑事侦查构造之比较研究[J];政法论坛;1999年05期
，本文编号：2500715
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2500715.html
