当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

论新《刑事诉讼法》对刑事侦查的挑战及应对

发布时间:2019-06-19 02:47
【摘要】:规范刑事诉讼活动的基本法律就是《刑事诉讼法》。自从我国于1979年制定《刑事诉讼法》,并于1996年进行了较大修改以来,《刑事诉讼法》中有关于程序、职权配置、制度等方面的配置在一定时期内是符合实际工作需要的。但是随着国内、国际司法环境的变化,以及我国自身社会、经济、文化等方面的蓬勃发展,在新的历史阶段里,《刑事诉讼法》必须进行一定程度的修改与更新。2012年3月14日,十一届全国人大五次会议对《刑事诉讼法》进行了大的修改与更新。本文从法律的视角,采取理论探讨和实践案例分析相结合的研究方法,多角度的阐述了新《刑事诉讼法》修改后,公安刑侦执法工作面临的挑战,并根据实际执法工作中发现的缺陷提出了相关的建议。全文共由三部分组成:第一部分,概述。首先简要阐述了新《刑事诉讼法》对公安刑侦工作的意义,介绍了《刑事诉讼法》的修改历程,并阐述了《刑事诉讼法》的修改对我国社会法制进程所起的推动作用和存在的意义。其次,介绍了新《刑事诉讼法》、新修订的《公安机关办理形式案件程序规定》和最高人民法院《关于适用中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法的解释》中有关公安刑侦工作的新规定,其中包括尊重和保障人权原则、非法证据的排除规则的确立、反对自证其罪原则、证据概念和证据形式的改变等方面。第二部分,《刑事诉讼法》修改对公安刑侦工作提出的挑战。此部分从新修改的《刑事诉讼法》出发,立足于我国基本国情和阶段性特征,从“尊重和保障人权”、完善辩护制度、改革强制措施、完善侦查措施、修改证据制度5个方面,具体分析了在《刑事诉讼法》修改的背景下,公安刑侦工作所面临的新任务、新挑战。第三部分,公安刑侦工作应对新《刑事诉讼法》挑战的对策思考。笔者针对第二部分提出的问题进行对策解答,为下步工作提出建议和意见。具体包括:转变思想观念,强化刑事讼诉对抗意识;改变办案模式,提升侦查破案整体战斗力;发挥技术导侦,为侦查取证提供科技支持;重视队伍建设,培养更多专业技术人才;强化实战训练,提高执法工作质量,从而积极应对新《刑事诉讼法》修改的背景下带来的新任务、新挑战。
[Abstract]:The basic law regulating the activities of criminal proceedings is the Code of Criminal procedure. Since the formulation of the Criminal procedure Law in 1979 and the great revision in 1996, the allocation of procedures, functions and powers and systems in the Criminal procedure Law has been in line with the needs of practical work in a certain period of time. However, with the changes of domestic and international judicial environment, as well as the vigorous development of our own society, economy, culture and so on, the Criminal procedure Law must be revised and updated to a certain extent in the new historical stage. On March 14, 2012, the fifth session of the Eleventh National people's Congress made great changes and updates to the Criminal procedure Law. From the perspective of law, this paper adopts the research method of combining theoretical discussion with practical case analysis, expounds the challenges faced by the law enforcement of public security criminal investigation after the revision of the new Criminal procedure Law, and puts forward some relevant suggestions according to the defects found in the actual law enforcement work. The full text is composed of three parts: the first part, an overview. First of all, this paper briefly expounds the significance of the new Criminal procedure Law to the work of public security criminal investigation, introduces the revision course of the Criminal procedure Law, and expounds the promoting function and existing significance of the revision of the Criminal procedure Law to the process of social legal system in our country. Secondly, it introduces the new Criminal procedure Law, the newly revised provisions on the procedure of handling cases by Public Security organs and the new provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China on the work of public security criminal investigation, including the principle of respecting and protecting human rights, the establishment of exclusionary rules of illegal evidence, the principle of opposing self-incrimination, the change of the concept of evidence and the form of evidence, and so on. The second part is the challenge posed by the revision of the Criminal procedure Law to the work of public security criminal investigation. Starting from the newly revised Criminal procedure Law, based on the basic national conditions and stage characteristics of our country, this part analyzes the new tasks and challenges faced by the public security criminal investigation work under the background of the revision of the Criminal procedure Law from five aspects: "respecting and protecting human rights", perfecting the defense system, reforming compulsory measures, perfecting investigation measures and revising the evidence system. The third part is the countermeasures of public security criminal investigation to meet the challenge of the new Criminal procedure Law. The author answers the questions put forward in the second part and puts forward some suggestions and suggestions for the next work. The details include: changing ideas, strengthening the consciousness of confrontation in criminal litigation; changing the mode of handling cases and improving the overall combat effectiveness of investigation and solving cases; giving full play to technical guidance and investigation to provide scientific and technological support for investigation and evidence collection; attaching importance to the construction of troops and cultivating more professional and technical personnel; strengthening actual combat training and improving the quality of law enforcement work, so as to actively cope with the new tasks and challenges brought about by the revision of the new Criminal procedure Law.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 余经林,吴东;论辩护律师的诉讼权利保障[J];安徽大学学报;2002年03期

2 陈军;死刑复核程序若干问题研究[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2003年01期

3 郑宁;钟秋;;行政诉讼视角下的房产估价报告有效期[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2009年01期

4 顾双平;蔡立旺;;典型案例引发的农业技术司法鉴定问题的思考[J];安徽农学通报;2006年09期

5 莫良元;;构建我国现代自由心证制度的价值研究[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年01期

6 杨锦炎;;论诉讼证明对象——以法律方法论为启示[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2009年05期

7 李佑标;论行政非法证据排除规则[J];安徽商贸职业技术学院学报;2003年01期

8 吴倩;李海亮;;公诉案件撤回起诉问题研究[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年01期

9 赵丽;;关于构建我国“隐蔽作证”制度的思考——以银川市为例[J];安康学院学报;2011年02期

10 方娇;陈晓曦;;上诉不加刑中的变相加刑问题分析[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2006年04期

相关博士学位论文 前10条

1 高田甜;WTO争端解决机制证明负担规则研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年

2 张卫彬;国际法院解决领土争端中的证据问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年

3 李健;论法官的主体性[D];复旦大学;2011年

4 邓多文;论刑法的合理性解释[D];西南政法大学;2010年

5 郑牧民;中国传统证据文化研究[D];湘潭大学;2010年

6 徐静;合同诈骗罪司法认定研究[D];吉林大学;2011年

7 崔起凡;国际商事仲裁中的证据问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年

8 尹华蓉;论亲告罪的合理范围[D];华东政法大学;2011年

9 冉杰;德性法律论证理论及其应用[D];中国政法大学;2011年

10 郭烁;刑事强制措施的体系及其适用研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年



本文编号:2502007

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2502007.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户779da***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com