当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

公安机关经侦部门初查制度研究

发布时间:2019-07-05 20:59
【摘要】:公安机关经侦部门的初查,是指公安机关的经济犯罪侦查部门对涉嫌经济犯罪的线索材料进行初步的审查、调查,以确定是否符合立案条件的活动。经济犯罪具有隐蔽性、复杂性、抽象性及其与经济纠纷的界限的模糊性等特点,实践中对犯罪案件所进行的初查活动相比较一般的刑事案件更为重要。目前,几乎公安机关所有的经济案件在立案前甚至接报案件后都会有询问、走访、调查取证、现场勘查等初查措施,甚至有的案件在立案前还必须先采取紧急措施,,之后再补办相关手续,初查所获取的证据材料在后续的审判中起到了重大的作用。 遗憾的是,初查的法律地位迟迟没有得到确认。2013年的新刑诉法仍然没有为初查“上户”,于是不少反对者以初查是刑诉法上的“黑户”为由否认初查中所获得的证据材料的证据效力,在实践必须与法律缺失的矛盾下,初查制度已然成为“刑诉法不得不说的一大漏洞”。有鉴于此,本文主要对公安机关经侦部门办理经济案件过程中的初查活动进行探讨。 本文主要分为四个部分来对公安机关经济案件的初查进行讨论。 第一部分全面分析我国公安机关经侦部门经济犯罪案件中的初查制度。涵盖了初查的概念、起源以及发展、法律属性、其与相关概念的辨析以及国外相关立法关于类似制度的规定等内容。 第二部分重点讨论备受争议的初查合法性、合理性、必要性以及初查制度在公安机关司法实践中的重要意义等问题。 第三部分主要针对公安机关初查的措施、策略,具体运行路径,应遵循的原则以及初查结果的证据效力问题提出自己的看法。 第四部分是关于我国公安机关初查制度的运行现状以及需要注意的几点。 客观存在决定人们的意识。长期以来,初查制度已然为经济犯罪案件工作所必须,切切实实地发挥着举足轻重的作用,那么,不久的将来,其被我国的刑事诉讼法所规定也是必然。
[Abstract]:The preliminary investigation of the economic investigation department of the public security organ refers to the preliminary examination and investigation of the clue materials of the suspected economic crime by the economic crime investigation department of the public security organ in order to determine whether it meets the conditions for filing a case. Economic crime has the characteristics of concealment, complexity, abstractness and fuzziness of its boundary with economic disputes. In practice, the preliminary investigation activities of criminal cases are more important than the general criminal cases. At present, almost all economic cases in public security organs will be questioned, visited, investigated, collected evidence, on-site investigation and other preliminary investigation measures before filing a case or even after receiving a case, and even some cases must take urgent measures before filing a case, and then complete the relevant formalities. The evidence materials obtained from the preliminary investigation have played an important role in the follow-up trial. Unfortunately, the legal status of the preliminary investigation has not been confirmed for a long time. The new criminal procedure law in 2013 is still not "registered" for the preliminary investigation, so many opponents deny the evidentiary effect of the evidence obtained in the preliminary investigation on the grounds that the preliminary investigation is the "household registration failure" in the criminal procedure law. Under the contradiction between the practice and the lack of law, the preliminary investigation system has become "a major loophole that the criminal procedure law has to say." In view of this, this paper mainly discusses the preliminary investigation activities in the process of handling economic cases by the economic investigation department of public security organs. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the preliminary investigation of economic cases in public security organs. The first part comprehensively analyzes the preliminary investigation system in the economic crime cases of the economic investigation department of the public security organs in our country. It covers the concept, origin and development of the preliminary investigation, the legal attribute, the discrimination between it and the related concepts, as well as the provisions of the relevant foreign legislation on similar systems. The second part focuses on the controversial legality, rationality and necessity of the preliminary investigation and the significance of the preliminary investigation system in the judicial practice of public security organs. The third part mainly puts forward its own views on the measures, strategies, specific operation paths, the principles to be followed and the evidence effectiveness of the preliminary investigation results of the public security organs. The fourth part is about the operation status of the preliminary investigation system of public security organs in our country and some points that need to be paid attention to. Objective existence determines people's consciousness. For a long time, the preliminary investigation system has been necessary for the work of economic crime cases, and plays an important role in practice. Then, in the near future, it is inevitable that it will be stipulated by the Criminal procedure Law of our country.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘炜烽;;浅谈“初查”制度[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2008年09期

2 詹琳玲;李哲;;浅议我国的侦查启动程序——立案[J];法制与社会;2009年08期

3 高新平;王晓伟;;职务犯罪初查的现实困境与改革途径[J];东岳论丛;2012年12期

4 刘忠;论经济犯罪案件立案前的初查工作[J];湖南商学院学报;2004年02期

5 张继生;;职务犯罪初查活动的性质定位与改革完善[J];中国检察官;2011年03期

6 龙宗智;;初查所获证据的采信原则——以渎职侵权犯罪案件初查为中心[J];人民检察;2009年13期

7 樊鸿儒;;论经济犯罪案件初查的必要性及其法律地位[J];商场现代化;2007年27期

8 刘广三;庄乾龙;;论刑事初查的属性及其立法完善[J];山东警察学院学报;2011年01期

9 宋阳;质疑经侦“初查”制度[J];犯罪研究;2004年03期

10 万毅;陈大鹏;;初查若干法律问题研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2008年04期



本文编号:2510809

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2510809.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7a631***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com