多数人侵权纠纷之共同诉讼类型研究兼论诉讼标的之“案件事实”范围的确定

发布时间：2019-08-03 13:00

【摘要】：《民事诉讼法》第52条立足于当事人与诉讼标的的关系,将"诉讼标的之同一或同一种类"作为必要共同诉讼和普通共同诉讼的区分标准;而在司法实务中,法官却立足于"案件基本事实的查明"来判断多数人侵权纠纷审理的"分"与"合"。采纳何种理论分析工具,才足以化解立法标准与司法标准两者之间的差异,是本论文论证的核心。"诉讼标的"的内容范围,可以通过"案件事实"这一可浮动元素加以控制。因此从"案件事实"是"请求所涉及的整体性的生活历程"之涵义界定出发,以"实体上责任关系是否具有整体性"来确定不同的多数人侵权纠纷类型下"同一案件事实"的外延范围,无疑是一种更为可行的共同诉讼类型的区分标准。
[Abstract]:Article 52 of the Civil procedure Law is based on the relationship between the parties and the subject matter of the action, taking "the same or the same kind of the subject matter of the action" as the criterion for distinguishing between the necessary joint action and the ordinary joint action, while in judicial practice, the judge judges judge the "division" and "combination" of the majority of tort disputes based on "the investigation of the basic facts of the case". What kind of theoretical analysis tool can be adopted to resolve the difference between legislative standards and judicial standards is the core of this paper. The scope of the content of "the subject matter of litigation" can be controlled by the floating element of "facts of the case". Therefore, starting from the definition that "case fact" is the meaning of "the whole life course involved in the request", it is undoubtedly a more feasible criterion to distinguish the types of joint litigation by determining the extension scope of "the same case fact" under different types of tort disputes by "whether the substantive liability relationship has integrity", which is based on the definition of "case fact" as the meaning of "the whole life course involved in the request", and to determine the extension of "the same case fact" under different types of tort disputes.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【基金】：2017年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“多数人侵权纠纷共同诉讼类型研究”(项目编号:17YJC820034) 2016年司法部中青年项目“新范式下的民事诉讼标的理论研究”(项目编号:16SFB3026)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】

多数人侵权纠纷之共同诉讼类型研究 兼论诉讼标的之“案件事实”范围的确定

多数人侵权纠纷之共同诉讼类型研究兼论诉讼标的之“案件事实”范围的确定