非法证据排除规则适用情况之实证研究——以东南地区某法院为例

发布时间：2019-08-15 07:37

【摘要】：非法证据排除规则自进入刑事诉讼法典以来给刑事审判实践带来了诸多适用困境与理论迷茫。通过对东南地区某法院关于该规则的适用情况进行调研分析,发现相关法律规范的操作性不强,司法机关的难以相互制约,重实体轻程序的传统司法观念,行政倾向性较强的畸形考核体系是其适用的现实障碍;非法取证方法的理解,刑讯逼供行为的界定,瑕疵证据得以补正的标准是其适用范围上的困境之处;办案说明与侦查人员出庭的审判选择,重复自白效力的如何认定,诉权启动程序中辩方的证明责任以及证据合法性的证明标准是其适用程序及裁判标准上的桎梏症结。对之进行适时调研分析和总结概括,找出适用瓶颈,探寻改进路径,方能达致设定该规则良善之初衷。
[Abstract]:Since entering the criminal procedure code, the exclusion rule of illegal evidence has brought many applicable dilemmas and theoretical confusion to the practice of criminal trial. Through the investigation and analysis of the application of this rule in a court in Southeast China, it is found that the operation of the relevant legal norms is not strong, the judicial organs are difficult to restrict each other, the traditional judicial concept of emphasizing entity over procedure, and the malformed assessment system with strong administrative tendency is the realistic obstacle to its application. The understanding of illegal methods of obtaining evidence, the definition of extorting confessions by torture, and the standard of correcting defective evidence are the difficulties in its scope of application; handling cases and the trial choice of investigators appearing in court, how to determine the effectiveness of repeated confessions, the burden of proof of the defense and the proof standard of the legality of evidence in the initiation of the right of action are the crux of its applicable procedures and judicial standards. Only by timely investigation, analysis and summary, find out the applicable bottleneck and explore the way to improve, can we achieve the original intention of setting the good and good rules.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金资助项目(11BFX104) 西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划资助项目(2011XZYJS011)
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】