认罪态度的认定依据应予明确
发布时间：2019-08-24 10:48
【摘要】：正起诉意见书、起诉书、判决书等法律文书通常都会在结尾部分用"认罪态度较好""认罪态度恶劣"等简洁语言对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的认罪态度下定论。但由于立法和司法解释未明确认罪态度的认定依据,在司法实践中,少数办案人员对认罪态度认定依据的收集、记录工作重视不足,导致部分案件的认罪态度结论缺乏足够依据。而在司法实践中,认罪态度对程序选择和实体结果都有重要影响。为了减少认定的恣意性,应当
[Abstract]:The legal documents, such as the positive indictment, the indictment and the judgement, are usually determined in the end part with a simple language such as the "bad attitude of the "The attitude of the crime is good."" and the like. However, due to the failure of the legislative and judicial interpretation to make the determination of the attitude of the crime, In the judicial practice, a few cases of case-handling personnel are based on the recognition of the attitude of the crime, the attention of the recording is not enough, which leads to the lack of sufficient basis for the conclusion of the identification of some cases, and in the judicial practice, The attitude of the crime has an important effect on the selection of the procedure and the results of the entity. In order to reduce the discretionary nature of the determination, it should
【作者单位】： 北京市西城区人民检察院;
【基金】：北京市中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心项目 北京市社会科学基金项目——《共享发展:刑事司法公正研究》(项目编号:16FXAL003)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2
[Abstract]:The legal documents, such as the positive indictment, the indictment and the judgement, are usually determined in the end part with a simple language such as the "bad attitude of the "The attitude of the crime is good."" and the like. However, due to the failure of the legislative and judicial interpretation to make the determination of the attitude of the crime, In the judicial practice, a few cases of case-handling personnel are based on the recognition of the attitude of the crime, the attention of the recording is not enough, which leads to the lack of sufficient basis for the conclusion of the identification of some cases, and in the judicial practice, The attitude of the crime has an important effect on the selection of the procedure and the results of the entity. In order to reduce the discretionary nature of the determination, it should
【作者单位】： 北京市西城区人民检察院;
【基金】：北京市中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心项目 北京市社会科学基金项目——《共享发展:刑事司法公正研究》(项目编号:16FXAL003)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王东庆;公安机关起诉意见书制作的要求[J];辽宁警专学报;2002年01期
2 葛燕青;三个机关的起诉意见书之比较[J];北京市政法管理干部学院学报;2000年01期
3 张书生;检察院自侦部门移送“不起诉意见书”不妥[J];人民检察;2002年02期
4 张靖;新格式起诉意见书修改与制作例谈[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2004年03期
5 李雅琴;;公安机关起诉意见书应加强说理性[J];惠州学院学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
6 高兆仑;;起诉意见书解析[J];福建法学;1998年02期
7 李文虎;公安机关不应制作提请不起诉意见书[J];检察实践;1999年05期
8 王东庆;;对一份起诉意见书正文的评析[J];应用写作;2002年09期
9 高兆伦;;严肃 科学 庄重 周全——起诉意见书面面观[J];应用写作;2000年02期
10 杨天勇;;论起诉意见书写作的两个问题[J];应用写作;2002年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 安徽省宣城市人民检察院 鲁建武;起诉意见书不宜直接认定自首[N];检察日报;2009年
2 记者 卢志坚 通讯员 志清 武检轩;督促起诉追缴国有资产5000万[N];检察日报;2012年
3 记者 范跃红 通讯员 邵U，
本文编号：2528911
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2528911.html
