“宪治”：基于政治哲学视角的解读

发布时间：2018-01-09 17:56

本文关键词：“宪治”：基于政治哲学视角的解读　出处：《河南大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文通过对政治哲学诸词语的辨析和宪法学诸概念的梳理来澄澈出宪治存在的空间,从价值和功能上对宪治做出描述。在描述过程中,力求回避任何主观形式的定义——无论国人惯常的抽象演绎还是西方的实证归纳,一概不予采用。这样做主要基于以下考虑:首先,作者学问浅薄,宪法学概念体系又庞杂繁复,盲目深入,只恐力拙难支。其次,概念话语大而空泛,唯恐陷入文字游戏与概念冲突的泥潭不得脱身。最后,如果强为之定义,以某一学说作为依据,则难逃主观,无论后期工作如何客观精到,前提若错,满盘皆输。文章分为如下几部分:首先是导论,主要包括写作初衷及选题辩护,还有对写作方式的澄清。正文则从介绍宪治的出处和概念特征入手,通过对政治哲学词汇的梳理和宪法学诸概念(包括宪法学相关概念)的探讨,逐渐引入从功能上有补足作用,在价值上无可取代的宪治,并以其作为重点,展开接下去的讨论。这些讨论主要包括:宪治与法治,宪治与民主,民主、宪治与宪政。虽然全文贯穿宪治作为主线,然而作者既没有直阐其意,也无欲深达其理,只迂回婉转,旁敲侧击:将宪治对法治道路的补充作用,追问民主的对话功能以及平衡民主宪政的衔接效果一并做出注解,最终顺理成章,导出它的终极意义:概念模型意义以及在此基础上衍生出来的交涉意义! 为什么需要交涉,一部分原因在前文导论部分说的清楚,然而有些心知肚明明知说不得却不得不说的东西,如毦在喉,不吐不快。我们受到西方话语压迫久矣,自由人权的大棒总能恰到好处地打击中国人的自信,使我们不得不忍气吞声,好像做错事的孩子。宪治这个词一如我把它译成的英文,有着温和内敛的品性,符合中华民族的传统美德,交涉是东西方学者共同的事业,交涉的目的,是为了互致理解。如若不能,奈何西方人要咄咄益甚?作者以为,不能或者不敢下定义,虽未尝不是全文的一大遗憾,文章显得没有底气也好,缺乏说服力也罢,却仍有一致命的优点:宪治的基架完成了,就像一项浩大的工程备足了材料,预算已经澄清,至于如何构造,如何发展,则是后话。至于以后再作别处填充,海纳百川,只要没有确笃的定义,自然可以包容崭新的价值。而且流水不腐,滚石无苔。常用常新岂不是更好,何必非要一了百了的万全定义来束缚手脚呢? 宪治说白了就是“橡皮子弹”,对付那些认为其他所有人都是妖怪其实自己才是妖怪的不要脸的大妖怪,我们的理论要预留一些旁白的空间,我们的概念和词语也最好多一些韧劲儿和弹性。全文的最后,欲言又止而又隐藏至深的,大概就是这层意思。
[Abstract]:In this paper, through analysis of political philosophy and the various words of the carding to actions of the various concepts of the treatment of existing space, from its value and function made to the medium. In the process of describing, in order to avoid any subjective definition form -- whether Chinese or Western Abstract Interpretation of habitual empirical induction, shall not be used. This is mainly based on the following considerations: first, the author learned shallow, constitutional system and numerous and complicated, blind, lest forces difficult. Secondly, the concept of discourse and vague fear into words and concepts of conflict quagmire not get out. Finally, if the definition is, to a doctrine as a basis, it would be subjective, regardless of the later work objective subtlety, provided if wrong, loser.
The article is divided into several parts as follows: the first part is the introduction, mainly including the original purpose of the writing and topic defense, also writing clarified. The text is from the source and characteristic of the constitutional concept of various concepts through combing the vocabulary of political philosophy and the (including constitutional concepts) to gradually introduced from complement function, can not be replaced by the value, which is a key, started the next discussion. These discussions include: the rule of constitution and law, governance and democracy, democracy, constitution and constitutionalism. Although the thesis penetrates the constitution as the main line, however, the author has no direct interpretation of its meaning, but also no desire the deep, only circuitous mildly, insinuating: supplement will constitution on rule of law road, asked democratic dialogue function and balance of constitutional democracy convergence effect together to make a comment, and ultimately derived its final logical. Extreme significance: the meaning of the conceptual model and the meaning of negotiation derived on this basis!
Why do we need negotiations, part of the reason in the earlier part of introduction to clear, but some well knows that may not have had to say something, such as Er in the throat, to speak out. We have long oppression of the western discourse, always stick to just perfect freedom and human rights Chinese hit confidence, so we have to swallow, seems to be doing something wrong the children. Treating the word as I translate it into English, has a mild introverted character, consistent with the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation, the eastern and Western scholars representations are the common cause representations with the purpose is to understand. If they can not be exchanged, but Westerners to hurry? The author thinks, can not or dare not by definition, although a big regret is not the full text of the article is no energy or lack of convincing or still has a fatal of advantages: by the frame is complete, like a Project an ample supply of materials, the budget has been clarified, as for how to construct, how to develop, it is something. As for the filling, unless later at all rivers run into sea, as long as there is no definition of exact nature can, inclusion of new value. But water does not rot, a rolling stone gathers no moss. The commonly used is not better, why not to define the Wanquan One finished, all is finished. bound?
Constitutional rule is simply "rubber bullets" against those who think that everyone else is in fact the monster himself is the monster's shameless big monster, our theory to reserve space for some narration, our concepts and words are more reengineer and the best flexibility. Finally, about to speak, but saying nothing of the deep and hidden that is probably the meaning.

【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D911

【参考文献】