香港特别行政区集会游行自由的法治保障与合理界限

发布时间：2018-04-28 23:06

  本文选题：香港特别行政区 + 法治　； 参考：《北方法学》2015年02期

【摘要】：香港特别行政区法院针对集会游行自由的主流审判法理是,集会游行权属基本权利,但该权利不是绝对的,仍须与公共利益、他人的权利和自由相权衡。在保障和规限之间的司法衡平基准是,任何限制该权利的特区立法或行政举措均须受制于"依法规限、民主社会所需、必要性"等三个要素的严格司法审查。集会游行自由在公、私物业场域的法律边界存在着一个宽广的"型谱",该型谱与集会自由之限制程度相关联,法官应结合相关要素就个案依法作出理性的判断。针对超越集会游行自由边界的违法行为,应严格依循罪刑法定、举证责任由控方承担的刑事法治原则,在量刑上应充分考虑基本人权因素。针对集会游行中激进化、暴力化现象日益蔓延的趋势,有必要发挥刑罚震慑性功能。
[Abstract]:The mainstream jurisprudence of the courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative region against the freedom of assembly and procession is that the right to assembly and procession is a fundamental right, but this right is not absolute and must be weighed against the public interest, the rights and freedoms of others. The criterion of judicial balance between protection and restriction is that any legislation or administrative measure of the SAR which restricts this right must be subject to the strict judicial review of the three elements: "according to law, what a democratic society needs, and what is necessary". The freedom of assembly and procession exists a broad "pattern spectrum" in the legal boundary of public and private property field, which is related to the degree of restriction of freedom of assembly. The judge should make a rational judgment on the case according to law combined with the relevant elements. In view of the illegal behavior beyond the boundary of the freedom of assembly and procession, we should strictly abide by the legality of the crime, the burden of proof should be borne by the prosecution, and the basic human rights factors should be fully considered in sentencing. In view of the trend of radicalization and violence in rallies and processions, it is necessary to exert the deterrent function of punishment.
【作者单位】： 湖南大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究项目“形式法治与实质法治二元发展路径研究”(项目编号12YJA820017)的研究成果
【分类号】：D921.9
，

本文编号：1817280