特殊盗窃未遂的刑事责任分析

发布时间：2018-01-06 14:07

  本文关键词：特殊盗窃未遂的刑事责任分析　出处：《法制与社会》2016年21期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 特殊盗窃 入户 未遂 但书条款

【摘要】：在《刑法修正案八》将入户盗窃、携带凶器盗窃、扒窃这几种特殊盗窃形态与普通盗窃、多次盗窃并列归入同一法律条文后,司法实务中对于入户盗窃等几种特殊盗窃的未遂形态是否应定罪处罚存在分歧。本文认为对待特殊盗窃不能一概认定罪或非罪,应结合刑法但书条款、司法解释及个案的具体情节进行分析认定。
[Abstract]:In the eighth Amendment to the Criminal Law, these special forms of theft, such as burglary, burglary with murder weapon and pickpocketing, were classified into the same legal provisions after many times of theft. In judicial practice, there are differences as to whether the attempted form of some special theft such as burglary should be convicted and punished. This article holds that special theft can not be considered as a crime or a non-crime, and should be combined with the proviso clause of criminal law. Judicial interpretation and the specific circumstances of the case for analysis and determination.
【作者单位】： 北京市密云区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： ，

本文编号：1388176