未遂犯量刑之结果加重犯比照标准研究

发布时间：2018-01-09 00:01

本文关键词：未遂犯量刑之结果加重犯比照标准研究　出处：《法制与社会》2016年23期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：未遂犯量刑比照标准既是一个司法实务问题,同时也是一个极具理论价值的课题。我国刑法采取的是精简条文的立法方式,因此,在许多条文的设置上,往往是一个条文中,包含几个不同层次的法定刑,其刑种的变化与刑度增减的联系点是"情节"、"数额"、"影响"等。在该立法模式下,如何根据未遂犯的处罚原则选择其量刑比照标准是一个较为困难的问题。具体而言,在存在未遂的结果加重犯的犯罪中,基本犯未遂但出现了加重结果的情形以及行为人为进行基本犯罪而故意实施了可能造成加重结果的行为,但加重结果并没有出现而基本犯既遂的情形,选择对该未遂行为的处罚,应以加重结果的法定刑为量刑比照标准,结合刑法总则关于未遂犯处罚原则的规定进行。
[Abstract]:The standard of penalty comparison of attempted offense is not only a judicial practice problem, but also a subject of great theoretical value. Our criminal law adopts a simplified legislative method, so, in many provisions of the setting. It is often a provision, including several different levels of statutory punishment, the change of the type of punishment and the penalty increase or decrease of the contact point is "plot", "amount", "impact", etc. In the legislative model. It is a difficult problem how to choose the standard of penalty comparison according to the principle of penalty of attempted offense. Specifically, in the crime where the result of attempted crime is aggravated. The attempt of the basic crime but the situation of the aggravated result and the behavior that the perpetrator intentionally carried out in order to carry out the basic crime, but the aggravated result did not appear and the basic crime was accomplished. To choose the penalty for the attempted act, the statutory penalty of aggravated result should be taken as the standard of comparison in sentencing, combined with the provisions of the general principles of criminal law on the principle of punishment for attempted offence.
【作者单位】：广东培正学院;华南师范大学;
【分类号】：D924.11
【正文快照】： 一、未遂犯量刑比照标准概述刑法理论对未遂犯的研究已比较深入,然而,考察司法实践,发现在对未遂犯量刑选择比照的标准时,司法机关做法有不同。继而对此部分未遂犯理论进行综述发现,学界对此问题的看法不一,通说理论存在难以解释的困境。因此,深入研究未遂犯量刑比照标准有其

【相似文献】