“人质型”抢劫的性质界定

发布时间：2018-01-09 02:25

本文关键词：“人质型”抢劫的性质界定　出处：《苏州大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“人质型”抢劫罪是指以下两种情形:(1)以非法占有为目的,通过对在现场的非被害人的其他人实施暴力、胁迫或者其他方法的手段,强行夺取被害人财物的行为属于“人质型”普通抢劫;(2)犯盗窃、诈骗、抢夺罪,为达到窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕或者毁灭罪证的目的,对在场其他人(非抓捕者或者阻止其窝藏赃物、毁灭罪证的人)当场实施暴力或者以暴力相威胁的行为属于“人质型”事后抢劫。“人质型”抢劫罪由于人质的介入,使得“人质型”普通抢劫与“财物型”绑架、“人质型”事后抢劫与“人质型”绑架存在相似之处。本文由两个案例引出问题,揭示了司法实践中存在将“人质型”抢劫错误地认定为绑架罪的现象。本文通过分别比较上述两种情形,主张通过考察以下要件来界分“人质型”普通抢劫与“财物型”绑架:(1)索财对象与人质的关系,(2)是否要求行为人利用索财对象对人质安全的担忧,(3)暴力、胁迫等行为的程度要求,(4)“当场”的确定。其中“当场”的确定是区分两罪的关键。“当场”的确定也是界分“人质型”事后抢劫与“人质型”绑架的标准之一。通过仔细分析“人质型”绑架中的“其他不法要求”的含义,可以看出两罪虽然罪质不同,但同为三方关系,且均为暴力犯罪。本文主张将“人质型”事后抢劫中的“窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕或者毁灭罪证”与“人质型”绑架中的“其他不法要求”视为特殊与一般的关系,为解决具体构罪问题提供思路。且“人质型”事后抢劫有前罪行为的要求,这也是其与“人质型”绑架的区别之一。
[Abstract]:The crime of "hostage-type" robbery refers to the following two situations: 1) for the purpose of illegal possession, by means of violence, coercion or other means against other persons who are not victims on the scene. The behavior of forcibly seizing the victim's property belongs to "hostage type" ordinary robbery; To commit the crime of theft, fraud or robbery, and to treat other persons present (non-captors) or to prevent them from harbouring stolen goods in order to achieve the purpose of harbouring stolen goods, resisting arrest or destroying criminal evidence. The act of violence or threat of violence on the spot belongs to the "hostage-type" afterwards robbery. "Hostage-type" robbery is due to the involvement of the hostage. There are similarities between "hostage-type" ordinary robbery and "property-type" kidnapping, "hostage-type" post-robbery and "hostage-type" kidnapping. This paper reveals the phenomenon that "hostage-type" robbery is wrongly regarded as the crime of kidnapping in judicial practice. It is advocated that the relationship between "hostage-type" ordinary robbery and "property-type" kidnapping: 1) the relationship between the object and the hostage should be divided into the following elements: (2) whether the perpetrator is required to take advantage of the concern for the safety of the hostage. (3) the degree of violence, coercion, etc. 4). The determination of "on the spot" is the key to the distinction between the two crimes. The determination of "on the spot" is also one of the criteria for dividing the "hostage-type" afterwards robbery from the "hostage-type" kidnapping. " The meaning of "other unlawful claim" in hostage-type "kidnapping". It can be seen that although the two crimes are of different quality, they are both tripartite relations, and both are violent crimes. This article advocates "hostage-type" later robbery "harboring stolen goods." Resistance to arrest or destruction of evidence "and" other unlawful requirements "in" hostage-type "kidnapping are regarded as special and general relations. It is one of the differences between hostage-type robbery and hostage-type kidnapping.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】