酷刑与文明——凌迟的谱系学考察

发布时间：2018-01-10 02:29

  本文关键词：酷刑与文明——凌迟的谱系学考察　出处：《读书》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

  更多相关文章： 谱系学 东方主义 话语体系 布鲁 热论 刑罚制度 异族统治 国家实践 死刑复核制度 司法传统

【摘要】：正在今日的公共话语体系中,"告别酷刑"俨然已成毋庸置疑的"政治正确"。无论基于合法程序抑或非法形式,对身体的直接侵犯皆易被视作亵渎人性与戕害人权。然而时至今日,在超过一半的国家实践中,酷刑仍被制度性地使用,显然,仅靠我们惯以为常的"文明"与否的话语,这一"告别"恐将难以实现。基于类似的历史敏感,卜正民、巩涛与格力高利·布鲁等人合著的《杀千刀》(下称"卜著")一书,通过对帝制中国法律极刑—凌迟的一次谱系学考察,配以东方主义的西学热论,对酷刑与文明问题做了生
[Abstract]:In today's public discourse system, "farewell to torture" has become an indisputable "political right", whether based on legal procedures or illegal forms. Direct violations of the body can easily be regarded as a violation of human nature and human rights. However, in more than half of the State practice today, torture is still systematically used, apparently. Depending on our usual words of "civilization" or not, this "farewell" will be difficult to achieve. Based on similar historical sensitivities, Pu Zheng-min. Gong Tao and Gligli Blu and others wrote "Kill a thousand swords" (hereinafter referred to as "the Poems"), through a genealogical investigation of the capital punishment of imperial Chinese law, Ling Chi, with Orientalism's theory of western learning. To torture and civilization.
【分类号】：D914
【正文快照】： 在今日的公共话语体系中,“告别酷刑”俨然已成毋庸置疑的“政治正确”。无论基于合法程序抑或非法形式,对身体的直接侵犯皆易被视作亵渎人性与戕害人权。然而时至今日,在超过一半的国家实践中,酷刑仍被制度性地使用,显然,仅靠我们惯以为常的“文明”与否的话语,这一“告别”，

本文编号：1403520