生态文明背景下我国环境刑事立法完善研究
发布时间:2018-01-15 16:24
本文关键词:生态文明背景下我国环境刑事立法完善研究 出处:《浙江农林大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着生态环境的日益恶化,世界各国也都纷纷寻找各种解决环境问题的方法。最初通过行政手段解决环境问题被各国普遍接受。由于危害环境的行为和手段日益多样化和复杂化,产生的危害后果也越来越严重,行政手段开始显得力不从心,已经无法及时有效地解决环境问题,此时,刑事手段介入环境犯罪问题就显得十分必要。在其他手段无法合理有效地解决环境问题的情况下,刑法作为保护法益的后位保障法,在环境犯罪的防控中具有根本性的强制作用,并且这种作用也变得愈发明显。 党的十八大把生态文明建设放在突出位置,将其上升为关系人民福祉、关乎民族未来的长远大计的高度。生态文明建设离不开环境法治。而对环境犯罪的刑事惩治是环境法治的最后屏障和手段。环境犯罪的刑事立法则是环境刑事法治的坚实基础,环境刑事法治离不开良好的环境犯罪之刑事立法。同样,在我国着力进行生态文明建设的当下,生态文明对环境刑事立法具有重要的指引作用,体现了遏制环境犯罪的最高境界。因此,若要有效地惩治环境犯罪,就必须顺应生态文明的时代精神,,把生态文明的理念渗透到环境刑事立法的过程中。 本文包括绪论和正文五部分,绪论对文章的选题背景和选题意义做了一个简要的阐述。正文首先介绍环境犯罪和生态文明的基本内容,具体包括环境犯罪的概念、特征和构成要件,生态文明提出的时代背景以及其基本内涵。然后简要介绍我国环境刑事立法的现状,指出环境刑事立法在立法理念、立法模式、罪名体例、刑法适用原则和刑罚种类方面存在的不足。进而分别评述了大陆法系国家和英美法系国家的环境刑事立法,并对其特点进行了分析,以德国、日本、英国和美国四个国家为典型。最后,通过汲取这些国家的先进经验对我国环境刑事立法的完善提出建议。
[Abstract]:With the worsening of ecological environment. Countries all over the world are also looking for a variety of solutions to environmental problems. At first, the solution of environmental problems through administrative means is generally accepted by all countries. Because of the actions and means of harming the environment, they are becoming more and more diversified and complicated. The harmful consequences are becoming more and more serious, administrative means began to appear inadequate, has been unable to solve environmental problems in a timely and effective manner, at this time. It is very necessary for criminal means to intervene in environmental crime. When other means can not solve environmental problems reasonably and effectively, criminal law is regarded as the law of protection of the interests of protection. In the prevention and control of environmental crime has a fundamental role, and this role has become increasingly obvious. In 18, the Party put the construction of ecological civilization in a prominent position and raised it to the well-being of the people. The construction of ecological civilization can not be separated from the environmental rule of law. The criminal punishment of environmental crime is the last barrier and means of environmental rule of law. The criminal legislation of environmental crime is the environmental criminal law. A solid foundation for governance. Environmental criminal law can not be separated from the good criminal legislation of environmental crime. Similarly, ecological civilization plays an important role in guiding environmental criminal legislation at the moment when our country is focusing on the construction of ecological civilization. Therefore, if we want to punish environmental crime effectively, we must conform to the spirit of ecological civilization and infiltrate the concept of ecological civilization into the process of environmental criminal legislation. This paper includes the introduction and the body of five parts, the introduction of the selected topic of the article background and significance of a brief exposition. First of all, the text introduces the basic content of environmental crime and ecological civilization. Specifically including the concept of environmental crime, characteristics and constitutive requirements, the background of the ecological civilization and its basic connotation. Then a brief introduction of the current situation of environmental criminal legislation in China. The author points out that the environmental criminal legislation is based on the legislative idea, legislative model and the crime style. Then it comments on the environmental criminal legislation of civil law countries and Anglo-American law system countries, and analyzes its characteristics, Germany, Japan. Four countries in Britain and the United States are typical. Finally, by drawing on the advanced experience of these countries, the author puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of our country's environmental criminal legislation.
【学位授予单位】:浙江农林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 侯帅;;环境犯罪危险犯的立法价值研究[J];安阳师范学院学报;2011年04期
2 刘仁文;刑法中的严格责任研究[J];比较法研究;2001年01期
3 王世洲;德国环境刑法中污染概念的研究[J];比较法研究;2001年02期
4 王力生;牛广义;;环境犯罪及其立法的完善[J];当代法学;1991年03期
5 李慧明;朱红伟;;对目前中国循环经济理论研究的几点思考[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
6 俞利平,王良华;论过失危险犯[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1999年03期
7 魏玮;英国如何对待成文法中的立法目的条款[J];法律适用(国家法官学院学报);2002年05期
8 白平则;;我国环境刑法法益论析[J];法学杂志;2007年04期
9 李卫红,单天水;论严格责任的严格程度[J];法学评论;2005年05期
10 赵赤,田信桥;论西方环境刑法的发展形态及其启示[J];广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年05期
本文编号:1429137
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1429137.html