贪污受贿犯罪之量刑标准的再界定

发布时间：2018-01-16 09:17

本文关键词：贪污受贿犯罪之量刑标准的再界定　出处：《比较法研究》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："数额+情节"量刑标准虽相比于传统的"计赃量刑"模式有一定的进步,但无法完全解决贪污受贿犯罪之量刑标准的体系性困境。突破这一困境的教义学路径在于:立足于报应和预防的二元刑罚目的观,认真对待"原点报应+罪刑阶梯"的量刑标准,其中,原点报应是实现预防犯罪之目标所需的刑罚量,其不在于架设罪、责、刑之间的阶梯,而是根据数额或情节对预防刑进行适度考虑,以免出现惩罚报应带来的刑罚过剩现象。而罪刑阶梯的架设,需要重视罚金等财产刑对实现量刑公正的意义。以原点报应实现犯罪预防和以财产刑架设罪刑阶梯,应成为贪污贿赂犯罪之法定刑的内在标准。
[Abstract]:Although the sentencing standard of "plot of amount" has some progress compared with the traditional mode of "measuring stolen goods and sentencing". However, it can not completely solve the systemic dilemma of sentencing standards for corruption and bribery crimes. The dogmatic path to break through this dilemma lies in the dual purpose view of punishment based on retribution and prevention. Take seriously the sentencing standard of "origin retribution for crime and punishment ladder", in which origin retribution is the amount of penalty needed to achieve the goal of crime prevention, which does not lie in the ladder between setting up crime, responsibility and punishment. But according to the amount or the circumstances of the appropriate consideration of preventive punishment, so as to avoid the phenomenon of excessive punishment brought by punishment retribution, and the erection of the ladder of crime and punishment. It is necessary to pay attention to the significance of property penalty such as fine to realize the justice of sentencing. To realize crime prevention by retribution of origin and to set up punishment ladder by property punishment should become the inherent standard of legal punishment for corruption and bribery crime.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：“江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目”(PAPD) 江苏高校区域法治发展协同创新中心项目“法治中国建设与区域法治发展研究”(项目编号:JCLL14002)的阶段性成果国家社科基金重点项目“建设社会主义法治文化研究”(14AZD144) 司法部委托项目“刑法解释的基本原理研究”(14SFB4005) 中国法学会项目“刑法修正的理论模型与实践研判研究”[CLS(2015)C79]的资助
【分类号】：D924.392
【正文快照】： 一直以来,贪污受贿犯罪的量刑标准问题备受争议。为了矫正贪污受贿犯罪“计赃论罪”之量刑标准过于机械化的缺陷,[1]《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(九)》(以下简称“《刑法修正案(九)》”)对贪污受贿犯罪采取“数额+情节”的定罪量刑模式,并提高了贪污受贿犯罪入罪与量刑的标准

【相似文献】