新型盗窃犯罪司法认定疑难问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-16 10:15

本文关键词：新型盗窃犯罪司法认定疑难问题研究　出处：《苏州大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《刑法修正案(八)》对盗窃犯罪进行了修订,修正后的刑法将实施入户盗窃、扒窃、携带凶器盗窃的行为直接认定为构成盗窃犯罪,这实际是将盗窃犯罪从几乎完全以数额定罪的桎梏中解脱出来。新型盗窃的入刑,将盗窃犯罪的入罪门槛降低,扩大了刑法对盗窃行为的打击范围,加大了对盗窃行为的打击力度,能更有力的保护人民群众的人身财产权益。时至今日,《刑法修正案(九)》已经颁布实施,而《刑法修正案(八)》对新型盗窃的规定引发的争议至今仍无统一意见,而司法实践中的审理认定模式也是不一而足。因此,对新型盗窃的理解与适用仍有进行研究的余地与需要。除前言外,本文共分为四大部分进行写作,具体内容如下:第一部分是对新型盗窃犯罪的综合概述。本部分对对新型盗窃犯罪的由来及演进进行了阐述,同时也阐明了新型盗窃行为直接入罪的价值与意义。新型盗窃犯罪的确立扩大了刑法对法益的直接保护范围,并且填补了《治安管理处罚条例》与《刑法》间链接的部分空白。第二部分是新型盗窃犯罪的行为要件的认定。通过对入户盗窃、扒窃、携带凶器盗窃具体构成要件的认定、与它罪间的转化等方面的具体描述,详细区别了新型盗窃与传统盗窃的差异。本部分中,对于具体何种行为构成新型盗窃提出了笔者的一些观点,并对诸如携带凶器盗窃与携带凶器抢夺此类相近且容易混淆的情形做出了区分。第三部分是新型盗窃犯罪是否受数额标准限制的问题。本部分中,提出对新型盗窃不应再适用传统盗窃相关的数额限制,但也不应将盗窃所涉及标的价值十分微小的偷盗行为直接认定为新型盗窃犯罪,具体的解决办法应当是在总则中加以明确,对此类型行为视为情节轻微不做为犯罪处理。第四部分是对新型盗窃形态的认定。为了对犯罪行为不同状态造成的侵害做出不同程度的评估,犯罪形态的认定有着重要的意义。本部分对新型盗窃行为的具体犯罪形态进行了详细的阐述与区别,明确新型盗窃犯罪着手、既遂、未遂的标准。
[Abstract]:The amendment to the Criminal Law (8) amended the crime of theft, and the amended criminal law directly recognized the act of burglary, pickpocketing, and theft with murder weapons as constituting a crime of theft. This is actually to free the crime of theft from the shackles of almost total conviction of the amount. The new type of theft will reduce the threshold of the crime of theft and expand the scope of the criminal law to crack down on the act of theft. To step up the crackdown on theft to protect the people's personal and property rights and interests. To this day, the Criminal Law Amendment (9) has been promulgated and implemented. However, there is still no unified opinion on the dispute caused by the regulation of new type theft in the Criminal Law Amendment (8), and the mode of adjudication in judicial practice is different. There is still room and need for research on the understanding and application of new theft. Besides the foreword, this paper is divided into four parts for writing. The specific contents are as follows: the first part is a comprehensive overview of the new crime of theft. This part describes the origin and evolution of the new crime of theft. At the same time, it also clarifies the value and significance of direct criminalization of new theft. The establishment of new crime of theft expands the scope of direct protection of legal interests in criminal law. And filled in the "Public Security Administration punishment regulations" and "Criminal Law" between the link part of the blank. The second part is the identification of the new crime of theft. Through the burglary, pickpocketing. The identification of the specific constituent elements of the theft with the murder weapon and the specific description of the transformation between the crime and other aspects distinguish the difference between the new type theft and the traditional theft in detail. In this part. The author puts forward some views on what kind of behavior constitutes a new type of theft. The third part is the question of whether the new crime of theft is limited by the standard of amount. In this part, the author makes a distinction between the similar and confusing situations such as the theft with the murder weapon and the robbery with the weapon with the murder weapon. It is proposed that the new theft should not be applied to the traditional theft related to the amount of restrictions, but also should not theft involved in the value of the very small value of the theft directly recognized as a new theft crime. The specific solution should be clear in the general principles. The 4th part is the recognition of the new form of theft. In order to make a different degree of evaluation of the infringement caused by the different state of criminal behavior. This part expounds and distinguishes the specific criminal form of the new type of theft in detail, and clarifies the standard of the new type of crime of theft, accomplished and attempted.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】