日本关于犯罪论的争论焦点及借鉴意义

发布时间：2018-01-17 22:17

本文关键词：日本关于犯罪论的争论焦点及借鉴意义　出处：《法学论坛》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：日本刑法学关于犯罪论之争的主导思想在于以民主主义刑法理念完成对威权主义刑法理念的反思。反思的着眼点在于:为了彻底地贯彻罪刑法定主义,尊重和保障人权,如何以客观主义刑法学取代主观主义刑法学;如何构建以构成要件(或者行为)为基础的犯罪论体系。关于犯罪论的具体问题的争论集中在四个方面:构成要件的体系定位及其机能的发挥;行为的定位及行为论的选择;行为无价值与结果无价值之争;责任的本质之争。与之相对照,我国刑法学关于犯罪论的研究存在构成要件机能论研究的模糊、忽视行为论研究、行为无价值与结果无价值之争意义不明、责任本质的不明确等不足之处。
[Abstract]:The leading thought of Japanese criminal law on the theory of crime lies in the reflection on the idea of authoritarian criminal law with the idea of democratic criminal law. The point of reflection lies in: in order to carry out the doctrine of legality of crime thoroughly. How to respect and protect human rights and how to replace subjectivism criminal jurisprudence with objectivism criminal jurisprudence; How to construct a criminal theory system based on constitutive elements (or acts). The debate on the specific issues of crime theory focuses on four aspects: the system orientation of constitutive elements and the exertion of their functions; The orientation of behavior and the choice of behavior theory; The argument between the behavior without value and the result with no value; In contrast, the study on the theory of crime in criminal law of our country has the fuzziness of function theory of constitutive elements, neglecting the study of behavior theory, and the meaning of the dispute between the action without value and the result without value. Inadequacies in the nature of responsibility.
【作者单位】：山东大学(威海)法学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第56批面上一等资助项目《否定的行为概念分析》(2014M560542)的部分成果
【分类号】：D931.3;DD914
【正文快照】： 近几十年来,日本刑法学关于犯罪论问题的争论主要集中在构成要件的体系定位及其机能的发挥、行为的定位及行为论的选择、行为无价值与结果无价值之争和责任的本质之争四个方面。隐藏在这些争论背后的主导思想在于,如何以客观主义刑法理念取代主观主义刑法理念,从而实现对二战

【相似文献】