过度维权行为与敲诈勒索罪的界限

发布时间：2018-01-18 08:39

本文关键词：过度维权行为与敲诈勒索罪的界限　出处：《辽宁大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文主要针对近年来愈演愈烈的在消费品瑕疵赔偿领域和上访领域中出现的，维权者通过向媒体曝光或向相关上级部门投诉等方式进行威胁，以希求索取高额赔偿的过度维权行为进行分析，并对这类权利行使行为是否应该作为敲诈勒索罪定罪及处罚进行论证。本文共分为五个部分。第一部分是案例及引发的思考。先重点介绍了三个国内典型的过度维权案例。其中两个消费者索赔领域的案件，一个是上访领域的案件，得出这类案件具有相似性的结论。并由此引发出对过度维权行为的思考，，以及对过度维权行为是否应该作为敲诈勒索罪定罪处刑的追问。第二部分是对过度维权行为本身进行的界定和分类。对过度维权行为的含义、特征、权利来源、产生原因进行了分析解读。并结合案例，将过度维权行为行为分别以行为特点和权利内容两个角度进行了分类。第三部分是从域外、域内两方面对过度维权行为与敲诈勒索罪界限的相关问题进行了考察，并进行评析。域外部分将大陆法系的日德、普通法系的英美四个国家对于权利行使行为入罪的问题进行了剖析。域内部分则是从有罪说和无罪说的学说争论入手，整合学者对此问题的意见。最后是笔者对于域内外学说的评析。第四部分是过度维权行为不宜认定为敲诈勒索罪的论证。从行为的性质、目的、手段等方面阐述了此行为与刑法所规定的敲诈勒索罪构成要件的不符。并从刑法谦抑性方面阐明了对此行为入罪应采取谨慎态度的原因。第五部分是对第一部分提出的三个案例的解决。并就过度维权行为本身存在不合理性、少数行为可以被建议入罪、相关法律的完善建议等问题提出了笔者的思考及论证。
[Abstract]:This article mainly aims at in the consumer goods flaw compensation domain and the petition field which appears in recent years, the rights advocate carries on the threat through to the media exposure or to the related superior department to complain and so on. Based on the analysis of the excessive rights protection behavior of seeking high compensation, the author proves whether the exercise of this kind of right should be considered as the conviction and punishment of extortion. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the case and the thinking caused by it. The first part focuses on the introduction of three typical domestic cases of excessive rights protection. Among them, two cases in the field of consumer claims, one in the field of petition cases. Draw the conclusion that this kind of case has the similarity, and thus lead to the thinking of excessive rights safeguarding behavior, as well as the question of whether the excessive rights protection behavior should be convicted and punished as the crime of extortion. The second part is the definition and classification of excessive rights protection behavior itself. The meaning, characteristics, rights source and causes of excessive rights protection behavior are analyzed and interpreted. The behavior of excessive rights protection is classified in terms of behavior characteristics and content of rights. The third part is from the extraterritorial and regional two aspects of excessive rights protection and extortion crime of the relevant issues are investigated and analyzed. The extraterritorial part of the civil law system of Japan and Germany. Four countries in the common law system have analyzed the problem of incrimination of the exercise of the right. The part of the region is from the theory of guilt and innocence argument. Finally, the author comments on the theory inside and outside the field. Part 4th is an argument that excessive rights protection should not be considered as the crime of extortion. From the nature and purpose of the act. This paper expounds the inconsistency between this behavior and the constitutive elements of the crime of extortion stipulated in the criminal law, and expounds the reasons for taking a cautious attitude towards the criminalization of this act from the aspect of modesty of the criminal law. The 5th part is the solution of the three cases proposed in the first part. There is irrationality on the excessive rights protection behavior itself, and a few acts can be recommended to be criminalized. The author's thinking and argumentation are put forward about the suggestion of perfecting the relevant laws and so on.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】