盗窃犯罪立法评述
发布时间:2018-01-18 08:21
本文关键词:盗窃犯罪立法评述 出处:《南昌大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:盗窃犯罪,是指刑法规定的能够以盗窃行为方式构成的犯罪的集合。在新中国成立后至今这段时间内,盗窃犯罪立法主要集中在其中的三个时间阶段,,即新中国成立后至1979年《刑法》颁布之前、1979年《刑法》颁布后至1997年《刑法》颁布之前、1997年《刑法》颁布后至今。这三个阶段的盗窃犯罪立法以盗窃行为犯罪化为总体趋势,宏观上体现了法益保护的及时性和法益保护的多元化特点,微观上体现了增设新罪名和修改犯罪构成要件是盗窃行为犯罪化的两种主要方式、单位盗窃犯罪和法定犯性质的盗窃犯罪这两类盗窃犯罪的犯罪圈都呈扩张趋势和刑法结构开始由“厉而不严”向“严而不厉”转变的特点。就现行刑法中的盗窃犯罪来看,当前盗窃犯罪立法存在罪名设置和法定刑配置两个方面的问题。在罪名设置方面,盗窃犯罪立法存在谦抑原则的悖反、明确性原则的悖反和协调性原则的悖反这三个方面的问题。在法定刑配置方面,盗窃犯罪立法存在刑罚结构总体上属重刑刑罚结构和具体个罪罪刑失衡的这两个方面的问题。
[Abstract]:The crime of theft refers to the set of crimes which can be constituted by the way of theft according to the criminal law. In the period since the founding of New China, the legislation of theft mainly concentrates in three time stages. That is, from the founding of the people's Republic of China to the promulgation of the Criminal Law on 1979, and from the promulgation of the Criminal Law on 1979 to the promulgation of the Criminal Law on 1997. Since the promulgation of the Criminal Law in 1997, the theft crime legislation in these three stages has turned the crime of theft into a general trend, which reflects the timeliness of legal interest protection and the pluralistic characteristics of legal interest protection. Micro reflects the addition of new charges and the revision of the elements of crime are the two main ways to criminalize theft. The crime circle of the crime of unit theft and the crime of theft of the nature of statutory crime are both expanding and the structure of criminal law begins to change from "severe but not strict" to "strict but not severe". From the point of view of the crime of theft in the current criminal law. At present, there are two problems in the legislation of theft crime: the setting of charges and the allocation of statutory punishment. In the aspect of setting charges, there is a contradiction of the principle of modesty in the legislation of theft. The contradiction of the principle of clarity and the contradiction of the principle of coordination. There are two problems in the legislation of theft crime: the penalty structure belongs to the heavy penalty structure and the specific crime and punishment are out of balance.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.35
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 储槐植;论刑法学若干重大问题[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1993年03期
2 齐文远;苏彩霞;;刑法中的类型思维之提倡[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2010年01期
3 陈兴良;;刑法竞合论[J];法商研究;2006年02期
4 张明楷;论刑法的谦抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1995年04期
5 张明楷;;盗窃与抢夺的界限[J];法学家;2006年02期
6 游伟;肖晚祥;;论行政犯的相对性及其立法问题[J];法学家;2008年06期
7 利子平;周建达;;非法获取公民个人信息罪“情节严重”初论[J];法学评论;2012年05期
8 付立庆;;论刑法用语的明确性与概括性——从刑事立法技术的角度切入[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年02期
9 桑红华;;试论刑事立法的适时性和科学性的统一[J];法律学习与研究;1987年06期
10 熊永明;;刑法立法协调性研究[J];河北法学;2011年01期
本文编号:1440190
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1440190.html