不纯正不作为犯罪等值性问题新论——从一道司法考试题引发的理论争鸣开始

发布时间：2018-01-20 04:01

本文关键词： 不纯正不作为犯等值性排他性　出处：《学术交流》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：女友和母亲同时落水应该先救谁?刑法对此问题的回答实际上是对不纯正不作为犯罪的等值性进行判断。不纯正不作为犯罪与作为犯罪之间的等值性判断需要经过形式和实质两个阶段。在形式判断阶段,刑法理论中的"法律规定的义务""职务上的义务""先前行为引起的义务"等形式上的义务类型是等值性判断的起点而非终点,对符合某种义务类型的不作为仍需根据具体情况做进一步实质的价值评判。如果义务主体对法益侵害因果流程的干预义务具有规范意义上的排他性,则可以肯定不作为与作为的等值性。如果多个义务主体同时存在,则每个义务主体的不作为都会因干预义务的排他性消失而失去与作为犯罪的等值性。
[Abstract]:Who should your girlfriend and mother fall into the water at the same time? The answer to this question in criminal law is actually to judge the equivalence of the crime of omission of impureness. The judgment of equivalence between the crime of omission of impureness and the crime of crime as a crime has to go through two stages: form and substance. Breaking phase. In the theory of criminal law, the types of formal obligations, such as "obligations stipulated by law", "obligations in office" and "obligations arising from previous acts", are the starting point rather than the end point of equivalence judgment. If the subject of the obligation is exclusive to the intervention obligation of the process of legal interest infringement causality, it is necessary to make further substantive value judgment according to the specific situation of omission according to a certain type of obligation. If multiple subjects of obligation exist at the same time, the omission of each subject will lose its equivalence with the crime because the exclusiveness of the obligation of intervention disappears.
【作者单位】：黑龙江大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： “我和你妈同时落水,你先救谁”,这是一道广为流传用来测验爱情深度的无聊问题。之所以无聊是因为这道题根本测不出爱情的深度,充其量有可能测出回答者智商的高度。也许因为女孩子们大都知道这是个无聊的问题,所以一旦男孩真的面对这个问题时,其最大可能是在面对女孩的撒娇,生

【相似文献】