醉驾认定标准多样化

发布时间：2018-01-22 06:26

本文关键词： 醉酒驾驶初步呼气酒精测试唾液酒精定性检测　出处：《河北企业》2016年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：自《刑法修正案(八)》将醉酒驾驶纳入刑法规制以来,对醉驾的惩治取得了良好的效果,但是,对于醉驾认定标准多样化仍存在一些争议。本文通过和英国、美国以及日本的醉驾认定标准和方法的对比,希望通过借鉴国外先进水平的标准和方法来推动我国对醉驾认定标准多样化趋势的发展,不能像以往一样仅凭单一的使用呼吸检测仪就确定驾驶者是否醉驾,我国应该探讨用多样化的标准来科学、合理地确定醉驾的方法,来更好地保障公众的人身和财产安全,从而进一步推动我国社会主义法治化健康发展。
[Abstract]:Since the Criminal Law Amendment (8) brought drunken driving into the criminal law regulation, the punishment of drunk driving has achieved good results. However, there are still some controversies on the diversification of the standards of drunk driving. By comparing the standards and methods of drunken driving in the United States and Japan, we hope to promote the diversification of the standards of drunken driving in our country by learning from the advanced standards and methods of foreign countries. It is impossible to determine whether the driver is drunk or not by using a single breathing detector as before. Our country should explore the scientific and reasonable method of determining drunk driving with diversified standards. To better protect the personal and property safety of the public, and further promote the healthy development of socialist rule of law in China.
【作者单位】：河北经贸大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 2011年出台的《刑法修正案(八)》将醉酒驾驶机动车的行为规定为危险驾驶罪行为方式之一,旨在以刑事手段为人民群众的生命和财产安全提供保护。这一新增罪名在司法实践中遭遇了种种困境,并且引发了热烈讨论,其中争议最大的莫过于“醉驾”的认定标准和认定方法问题。一、我国

【相似文献】