刑法中的数额累计问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-23 08:52

本文关键词： 数额犯数额累计多次犯罪行为未经处理　出处：《海南大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：数额累计制度的存在,一方面适应了我国“既定性又定量”刑事立法模式下“犯罪”概念的要求,另一方面这一制度也通过累计计算方式使数个罪轻情形按罪重情形来处理,更好地实现罪刑均衡原则。但目前我国刑事立法及刑事司法解释对于数额累计的中心术语如“多次”、“未经处理”等的规定还存在相矛盾之处,并且,刑事司法实践中数额累计也面临着如针对同一对象的多次行为如何进行数额累计以及选择罪名下如何进行数额累计等问题的适用存在困境。鉴于此,本文期望通过对数额累计制度的上述问题进行分析、界定,促使该制度在我国更好地适用。全文主要分为三个部分：第一部分是数额累计的规范梳理和学理分析。数额累计制度在我国刑法中的规定是统一和简单的,但刑事司法解释对此制度的规定却是矛盾的。数额累计制度在多次行为中涉及行为均为同质的犯罪行为时,应以多次行为属于独立还是连续的同质行为作为区分点,分别以多次一罪说和连续犯说作为理论基础；当在多次行为中有违法行为时,则以连续行为说作为理论基础。数额累计制度适应了我国刑事立法中对犯罪概念中量的要求,也适应了罪行均衡原则中“区别”的内涵。从社会的立场及社会危害性量变到质变的规律出发,数额累计制度应当可以扩展至所有的数额犯。第二部分为数额累计既有规范中核心术语的解释,主要是对我国现行刑法和有关刑事司法解释中数额累计规定的四个核心术语(“多次”、“行为”、“未经处理”以及“时效”)进行理解和界定。数额累计制度中的“多次”应界定为两次及两次以上,从而有利于维护法制度的完整；数额累计制度中的“行为”应界定为既包括犯罪行为也包括违法行为；数额累计制度中的“未经处理”应明确为“未经行政处罚”,从而实现数额累计制度升格多次行为犯罪化的功能；此外,数额累计制度应该明确时效制度,对于达到犯罪标准的行为实行追诉时效制度,而对于违法行为适用行政时效。第三部分是数额累计司法适用中疑难问题的分析。主要对数额累计在司法适用中最为常见的四个疑难问题,进行详细分析。针对同一对象多次行为的数额累计,后次行为侵害新法益作为数额累计制度适用的前提；而在选择罪名下,以“不同宗”作为数额累计制度适用的前提；在连环犯罪中,以行为人实际取得财物作为数额累计制度的适用条件；此外,在涉及到不同区域时,数额累计制度下的数额标准以审判地为准,按照不同地的比率进行折算。
[Abstract]:On the one hand, the existence of the accumulative amount system meets the requirements of the concept of "crime" under the criminal legislation mode of "established and quantitative" in our country. On the other hand, this system also makes several misdemeanor cases deal with serious cases by accumulative calculation. But at present, the central terms of criminal legislation and criminal judicial interpretation of the cumulative amount such as "many times", "untreated" and other provisions are still contradictory, and. In the practice of criminal justice, the accumulative amount of amount is also faced with difficulties such as how to accumulate the amount for the same object's multiple acts and how to carry out the amount accumulation under the selected charge. In view of this. This paper hopes to analyze and define the above problems of the accumulative sum system, so as to make the system more applicable in our country. The thesis is divided into three parts: The first part is the normative combing and theoretical analysis of the accumulative amount. The regulation of the accumulative amount system in the criminal law of our country is unified and simple. However, the criminal judicial interpretation of this system is contradictory. The amount of cumulative system in many acts involved in the conduct of the same nature of the crime. The distinction should be based on the theory that multiple acts are independent or continuous, and the theory of multiple crimes and continuous offenses should be taken as the theoretical basis respectively. When there are illegal acts in many acts, the theory of continuous act is taken as the theoretical basis. The accumulative amount system adapts to the requirement of quantity in the concept of crime in the criminal legislation of our country. It also adapts to the connotation of "distinction" in the principle of balance of crimes. From the standpoint of society and the law of social harmfulness changing to qualitative change, the system of accumulative sum of amount should be extended to all crime of amount. The second part is the interpretation of the core terms in the existing norms, mainly the four core terms ("multiple", "behavior") in the current criminal law and the relevant criminal judicial interpretation. "untreated" and "limitation") shall be understood and defined... the "multiple" in the accumulative system of amounts shall be defined as two or more times, thus contributing to the preservation of the integrity of the legal system; The "act" in the accumulative system of the amount should be defined as including both the criminal act and the illegal act; The "untreated" in the accumulative total amount system should be defined as "without administrative punishment", so as to realize the function of the amount accumulation system being upgraded to criminal behavior for many times; In addition, the system of accumulative sum of amount should define the system of limitation, implement the system of limitation of limitation for acts that meet the standard of crime, and apply administrative prescription for illegal acts. The third part is the amount of cumulative judicial application of the analysis of difficult problems, mainly the amount of cumulative in the judicial application of the most common four difficult problems. Detailed analysis. For the same object of multiple acts of the amount of cumulative, the latter acts against the new legal benefits as the premise of the application of the cumulative amount system; Under the choice of charges, "different families" as the premise of the application of the cumulative amount system; In the serial crime, take the actor actually obtains the property as the applicable condition of the accumulative amount system; In addition, when it comes to different regions, the amount criterion under the system of accumulation of amounts is based on the place of trial and converted at different rates.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924

【参考文献】