我国异种自由刑并罚原则的反思与重构

发布时间：2018-01-24 09:05

本文关键词： 异种自由刑《刑法修正案(九)》数罪并罚刑罚　出处：《法学杂志》2017年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：长期以来,异种自由刑的并罚在我国刑法立法中处于空白。为回应实践的需要并平息理论界的争议,《刑法修正案(九)》第4条对异种自由刑的并罚原则作出了明确的规定。然而,该规定并没能使学界在此问题上的争议尘埃落定,相反,其自身的合理性值得检讨和质疑,比如导致刑罚结果不公正、在逻辑上出现悖论、违背罪责刑相适应原则、不利于刑罚目的的实现等,故建议在有期徒刑与拘役并罚时,在将拘役换算成有期徒刑的基础上以限制加重原则进行并罚;在有期徒刑与管制、拘役与管制并罚时,应采用吸收原则,只执行有期徒刑、拘役。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the concurrent punishment of different kinds of free punishment has been in blank in our criminal law legislation. In order to respond to the need of practice and settle the controversy in the theoretical circle. Article 4 of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) makes a clear stipulation on the principle of concurrent punishment of freedom of different species. However, this provision has not settled the controversy in the academic circles on this issue, on the contrary. Its rationality deserves to be reviewed and questioned, such as resulting in unfair results of punishment, logical paradox, violation of the principle of the adaptation of crime and punishment, is not conducive to the realization of the purpose of punishment, and so on. Therefore, it is suggested that when the penalty of imprisonment and criminal detention is combined, the principle of restriction and aggravation should be taken on the basis of converting criminal detention into fixed-term imprisonment. In the case of imprisonment and public surveillance, criminal detention and public surveillance, the principle of absorption should be adopted and only fixed-term imprisonment and criminal detention should be carried out.
【作者单位】：华中科技大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.1
【正文快照】： 数罪并罚作为一项重要的刑罚制度,它所解答的是一人在犯数罪的情况下,如何将数个宣告刑合并成为一个最终应当执行的刑罚。《刑法修正案(九)》出台之前,我国《刑法》第69条明确规定了数罪并罚的总体原则。基本内容是:在一人所犯数罪中有一罪被判处死刑或无期徒刑的情形下,按照

【相似文献】