共同犯罪中望风行为的性质问题研究
发布时间:2018-01-25 09:15
本文关键词: 共同犯罪 望风行为 性质 正犯 共同正犯 出处:《中国青年政治学院》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:望风行为是一种十分常见的共同犯罪行为样态,一般指的是为正在进行的犯罪活动观察风头动静。现实中的望风行为具有复杂性,行为方式各异。不同的情况下,共同犯罪中的望风行为可能表现为帮助行为,也可能表现为正犯行为。由于共同犯罪立法体例的缘故,对望风行为的性质的界定问题在我国并未得到重视。我国理论、实践往往过于重视依靠行为在犯罪中的作用来判定刑罚。这种做法可能会存在规范问题为刑罚所取代、难以面对复杂的望风情形等等隐患。本文坚持,我国在认定望风行为时,应分阶段进行,先决定性质再决定刑罚,这种处理方式将利于更科学、准确地对望风行为进行定罪量刑。本文主要从以下几个方面展开:引言主要交待了选题的原因及意义。文章第一部分,界定望风行为的含义和类型。文章第二部分,比较研究各国(地区)司法实务在望风行为的性质认定问题上的做法。通过研究发现我国司法实践不重视对望风行为的性质的认定。我国司法活动中忽略对共同犯罪行为的定性,过度依据其作用科处刑罚的做法存在危害,应在司法中重视望风行为的性质的问题。文章第三部分,梳理主要国家(地区)共同犯罪的立法。通过对立法的梳理发现目前主要存在单一的正犯体系与二元犯罪参与体系;各国(地区)关于正犯的概念的重视态度各有不同,在判断望风行为性质时也存在不同做法。我国立法存在单一正犯体系与二元犯罪参与体系之争;对于我国共同犯罪人分类方法体例也存在多种说法,通说的解释存在隐患。文章第四部分,概述望风行为性质判断相关的共同犯罪基础理论并表明本文的基本立场。当今各国(地区)在望风行为性质认定这一具体共同犯罪问题处理时主要有主观说、客观说、折衷说这三种判断标准,本文对这三种标准进行了评述。总结了判断望风行为时的普遍思路并提出自己的思考。文章第五部分,重点研究望风行为成立共同正犯行为的可能性。总结成立望风行为的性质存在多种可能,但本文重点研究望风行为成立共同正犯的可能性。其中内容包括共同正犯相关的概念厘清、成立共同正犯行为的基本条件及特殊的共同正犯类型。
[Abstract]:Lookout behavior is a very common joint criminal behavior behavior, generally refers to the ongoing criminal activities to observe the momentum of the movement. In reality, lookout behavior is complex. Different ways of conduct. Under different circumstances, the lookout behavior in the joint crime may be manifested in the act of helping, or the behavior of the principal offender, as a result of the legislative style of the joint crime. No attention has been paid to the definition of the nature of lookout behavior in China. Practice often pays too much attention to rely on the role of behavior in the crime to determine the penalty. This practice may exist the normative problem is replaced by the penalty, difficult to face the complex lookout situation and other hidden dangers. In determining the behavior of lookout, our country should proceed in stages and decide the nature before deciding the penalty. This kind of treatment will be more scientific. This paper mainly from the following aspects: the introduction mainly explains the reasons and significance of the topic. The first part of the article. Define the meaning and types of lookout behavior. Part two. Comparative study of countries (regions). Judicial practice in the nature of lookout behavior approach. Through the study found that our judicial practice does not attach importance to the nature of lookout behavior. Our judicial activities ignore the characterization of joint criminal acts. The practice of excessive punishment according to its role is harmful. We should pay attention to the nature of lookout behavior in the administration of justice. The third part of the article. Combing the legislation of common crime in the main countries (regions). Through combing the legislation, it is found that there is a single principal offender system and a dual criminal participation system. Different countries (regions) pay different attention to the concept of principal offender, and there are different ways to judge the nature of lookout behavior. There is a dispute between single principal offender system and dual criminal participation system in our legislation; For the classification of joint offenders in our country there are also a variety of statements, general explanation of the existence of hidden dangers. Part 4th of the article. This paper summarizes the basic theory of joint crime related to the nature of lookout behavior and shows the basic position of this paper. Nowadays countries (regions) mainly have subjective theory in dealing with the specific joint crime problem when determining the nature of lookout behavior. Objectively speaking, eclectic theory of these three criteria, this paper reviews the three criteria, summarizes the general thinking in judging the behavior of lookout, and puts forward his own thinking. Part 5th of the article. This paper focuses on the possibility of establishing joint principal offender behavior of lookout behavior. There are many possibilities to sum up the nature of established lookout behavior. However, this paper focuses on the possibility of establishing a joint principal offender in lookout behavior, including the clarification of the related concepts of the joint principal offender, the basic conditions of establishing the joint principal offender act and the special types of joint principal offender.
【学位授予单位】:中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D914
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 高汉成;;《大清刑律草案》立法宗旨的历史错位[J];环球法律评论;2006年04期
2 赵辉;;略论组织犯的存在范围[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年06期
3 江溯;;单一正犯体系研究[J];刑事法评论;2009年01期
4 刘洪;;我国刑法共犯参与体系性质探讨——从统一正犯视野[J];政法学刊;2007年04期
,本文编号:1462543
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1462543.html