不作为的共同犯罪

发布时间：2018-01-27 01:06

本文关键词： 不作为共同犯罪正犯共犯　出处：《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：不作为的共同犯罪如何区分正犯与共犯,可提出以下判断标准:若待归责的行为实现了相关构成要件,且不作为者具备必要的正犯者身份与主观构成要件要素,该行为会被论以正犯而受处罚。相反,若待归责的行为只是具备了教唆犯或帮助犯的要件,只能将这一行为评价为共犯。具体来讲:守卫型保证人有责任保护第三人不遭遇危险或不受到侵害,且能防止直接正犯者实施作为,他对此负直接正犯者的刑事责任。若第三人的行为是教唆犯或帮助犯,保证人的不作为是共犯;对某法益负责的保护型保证人有义务防止他人实施犯罪却没有防止,其行为成立直接正犯。若他人行为是教唆犯或帮助犯,保证人的不作为是共犯。
[Abstract]:How to distinguish the principal offender and the accomplice in the joint crime of omission can be judged by the following criteria: if the act to be imputed has realized the relevant constitutive elements, and the omission person has the essential elements of the principal offender's identity and the subjective constituent element. The act would be punished for the principal offence. On the contrary, the act to be imputed would only have the elements of the abettor or the aider. This behavior can only be assessed as an accomplice. Specifically, the guardian guarantor has the responsibility to protect the third person from danger or infringement, and can prevent the direct principal from committing the act. If the third party's behavior is abettor or aider, the guarantor's omission is an accomplice; A protective guarantor who is responsible for a legal interest has an obligation to prevent another person from committing a crime but does not prevent his act as a direct principal. If another person acts as an abettor or an aider, the guarantor's omission is an accomplice.
【作者单位】：德国海德堡大学法学院;四川大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 一、导论不作为中,能否区分以及怎样区分正犯与共犯,这样的法律问题当然属于刑法总论中基本的教义学难题。在判例与文献中提出的许多理论尤其证明了这一点。本文的目的在于提出笔者自己的解决方案,当然该方案与其他理论并非完全不搭界,而是要接受其他理论中的合理观点,并能够

【相似文献】