刑法中被害人承诺之错误研究
发布时间:2018-01-28 12:09
本文关键词: 被害人承诺 错误 自主决定权 出处:《南昌大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:被害人承诺作为当今最主要的超法规之排除犯罪性事由,日益受到中外刑法学者的重视,对被害人承诺的研究无论从深度还是广度上都有了极大的发展,也产生了诸多的争议,关于被害人承诺之错误问题就是其中最具争议性的议题之一。被害人承诺错误问题研究的核心即在错误承诺时,承诺的效力如何?要回答这个问题,首先就得界定何为被害人承诺之错误,然后再对现有的承诺错误理论进行深入分析、研究,以期得到一个合理的回答,而这也是本文的行文脉络。文章主要分为三个部分,从阐述被害人承诺错误的基本含义为出发点,在剖析目前国内外在此方面的研究现状的基础上,继而提出了自己在此问题上的若干看法。第一部分先界定了被害人承诺错误的概念,接着在分析国内外学者对错误承诺分类的基础上提出了自己若干看法,最后阐述了该问题研究的价值。第二部分深入剖析了被害人承诺错误理论的研究现状,从大陆法系的“全面无效说”、“法益错误说”及“新全面无效说”等系统理论到英美法系及我国在分类基础上的个别化判断,再到本人对此问题的看法即“新法益错误说”的提出。第三部分是文章的重点内容,着重分析了“新法益错误说”理论的基本内容,主要是以自主决定权为主线,依次探讨了自主决定权的含义、侵害自主决定权的判断基准等问题。在这部分的最后,结合承诺错误的分类对侵害自主决定权判断基准进行司法运用。
[Abstract]:As the most important reason for the elimination of crime, victim commitment has been paid more and more attention by Chinese and foreign criminal law scholars. The research on victim commitment has been greatly developed both in depth and breadth. There is also a lot of controversy about the error of victim commitment is one of the most controversial issues. The core of the study of the error of victim commitment is the effectiveness of the commitment in the case of false commitment. In order to answer this question, we must first define what is the fault of the victim's commitment, and then deeply analyze and study the existing commitment error theory in order to get a reasonable answer. This is also the context of this article. The article is mainly divided into three parts, from the basic meaning of the victim commitment error as the starting point, in the analysis of the current domestic and foreign research in this area on the basis of. The first part defines the concept of victim commitment error, and then puts forward some views on the basis of the analysis of domestic and foreign scholars on the classification of false commitment. In the second part, the author deeply analyzes the research status of the theory of the victim's commitment error, from the perspective of "total invalidity" in the civil law system. The systematic theories such as "the theory of legal interest error" and "the theory of new total invalidity" have been applied to the individualized judgment of Anglo-American law system and our country on the basis of classification. The third part is the focus of the article, focusing on the analysis of the basic content of the theory. Mainly taking the independent decision as the main line, this paper discusses the meaning of the independent decision in turn, the judgment standard of the infringement of the independent decision, and so on. At the end of this part. Combined with the classification of commitment errors, the judicial application of the judgment standard of infringement of independent decision is carried out.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D924
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 杨立新;刘召成;;论作为抽象人格权的自我决定权[J];学海;2010年05期
2 熊永明;;论自我决定权在器官移植中的行使边界[J];法学杂志;2009年01期
3 黎宏;;被害人承诺问题研究[J];法学研究;2007年01期
4 郭理蓉;被害人承诺与认识错误[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2003年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张若然;论刑法中的被害人同意[D];山东大学;2011年
,本文编号:1470720
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1470720.html