我国刑法中的伪造行为研究

发布时间：2018-01-28 23:50

本文关键词： 伪造行为对象可罚性特征基本类型立法完善　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：伪造行为自古有之，行为人通过不同方法对各种事物进行伪造。但是，并不是所有的伪造都是刑法中的伪造行为。刑法中的伪造行为应该是符合构成要件的行为，会严重损害社会公共信用。由于我国刑法是以犯罪客体为依据来划分犯罪类别的，国内学者在研究伪造型犯罪时大多着眼于个罪的犯罪构成要件，甚少有对伪造行为进行专门的系统性研究。本文通过对我国刑法中的伪造行为进行深入分析，以期能够对我国的立法与司法实践产生积极影响。在引言部分，笔者主要说明了选题的原因、背景以及写作意义。除了引言，本文正文共分4个部分，约4万余字。第一部分是我国刑法中伪造行为的概述。在这部分，笔者首先介绍了伪造的词源、伪造行为的历史渊源以及我国古代关于伪造犯罪的相关立法规定。其次，以刑法中的行为概念为切入点，引出我国现行刑法中伪造行为的含义及本质。第二部分是我国刑法中伪造行为的对象和可罚性特征。这部分是文章的重点之一。笔者从属性和范围两方面对其对象进行界定，认为我国刑法中伪造行为的属性应是“社会公共信用性”和“真实存在性”，范围则主要限定在货币、有价证券、文书和印章四大类；以“足以使一般人误以为真实有效”和“严重影响社会秩序”对刑法中的伪造行为进行可罚性分析。第三部分是我国刑法中伪造行为的基本类型。在这部分，笔者按照不同标准对伪造行为进行分类。首先，基于制作权限将伪造行为分为有形伪造行为和无形伪造行为，其中有形伪造行为包括了狭义的有形伪造和有形变造，无形伪造行为包括了狭义的无形伪造和无形变造；其次，基于行为方式将伪造行为分为伪造、变造、擅自制造。第四部分是我国刑法中伪造型犯罪的立法完善。基于前文的论述，，笔者将本文的落脚点放在伪造型犯罪的立法完善这一块。首先，笔者对我国刑法中伪造型犯罪的立法现状进行分析，主要阐明了伪造型犯罪的现行立法体例、行为对象和行为方式这三方面的困境，进而提出自己的些许完善建议。
[Abstract]:Forgery has existed since ancient times, the actor forges all kinds of things through different methods. Not all forgery is forgery in criminal law. Forgery in criminal law should be in accordance with the constitutive elements of the act. Because the criminal law of our country is based on the object of crime to classify the crime, most of the domestic scholars focus on the constitutive elements of the individual crime when studying the crime of forgery. There is very few systematic research on forgery. This paper makes a deep analysis of forgery in our criminal law in order to have a positive influence on the legislation and judicial practice of our country. In the introduction part, the author mainly explains the reason, background and writing meaning of the topic. In addition to the introduction, the text of this paper is divided into four parts, about 40,000 words. The first part is an overview of forgery in our criminal law. In this part, the author first introduces the etymology of forgery, the historical origin of forgery and the relevant legislative provisions on forgery in ancient China. Taking the concept of behavior in criminal law as the starting point, the meaning and essence of forgery in current criminal law of our country are elicited. The second part is the object and punishment characteristics of forgery in our criminal law. This part is one of the emphases of the article. The author defines the object from two aspects: attribute and scope. The author thinks that the attribute of forgery in criminal law of our country should be "social public credit" and "real existence", the scope of which is mainly limited to four categories: currency, negotiable securities, documents and seals. This paper analyzes the penalty of forgery in criminal law with "enough to make ordinary people think that it is true and effective" and "seriously affects the social order". The third part is the basic types of forgery in our criminal law. In this part, the author classifies forgery according to different standards. First of all. Based on production authority, forgery is divided into tangible forgery and intangible forgery, in which tangible forgery includes tangible forgery and tangible alteration in narrow sense. Intangible forgery includes intangible forgery and intangible alteration in narrow sense. Secondly, forgery is divided into forgery, alteration and unauthorized manufacture based on behavior. The 4th part is the legislative perfection of the forgery crime in the criminal law of our country. Based on the discussion above, the author puts the foothold of this article on the legislative perfection of the forgery crime. First of all. The author analyzes the current legislative situation of the forgery crime in our criminal law, mainly expounds the current legislative style, behavior object and behavior mode of the forgery crime. And then put forward their own little suggestions for improvement.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】