减刑、假释的目的反思与制度变革

发布时间：2018-01-29 19:46

本文关键词： 减刑假释教育刑重返社会　出处：《现代法学》2015年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国减刑、假释以教育、矫正犯罪人为目的,为此目的而构建的减刑、假释制度不仅实践操作与目的错位,而且还导致司法腐败、倾斜适用、释放后再犯罪等现实问题。西方国家最初设立减刑、假释制度,并不是为了教育、矫正犯罪人,后来教育刑论者试图以教育、矫正作为减刑、假释目的,最终却走向失败。晚近以来,重返社会思想因关注未来,帮助犯罪人重新适应社会生活而逐渐受到重视,不少国家以重返社会思想为指导,改革调整其减刑、假释制度,扩大渐进释放范围。我国减刑、假释的目的当转向重返社会,并构建以自动给予的减刑为基础的假释制度。
[Abstract]:Commutation of sentence, parole to education, correction of offenders for the purpose of commutation, the purpose of the commutation, parole system not only practical operation and purpose dislocation, but also lead to judicial corruption, tilt applicable. Western countries initially set up a commutation and parole system, not for the purpose of education, correction of offenders. Later, educationalists tried to use education, correction as the purpose of commutation and parole. Recently, the thought of reintegration has been paid more and more attention because of paying attention to the future and helping the criminals to adapt to the social life. Many countries take the social reintegration thought as the guidance, and reform and adjust their commutation of sentence. Parole system, expanding the scope of progressive release. The purpose of commutation and parole in China should be reintegrated into society, and the parole system based on automatic commutation of sentence should be constructed.
【作者单位】：河南大学法学院;
【基金】：2013年度国家社科基金项目“自由刑变更执行研究”(13BFX076)
【分类号】：D914
【正文快照】： 近年来,减刑、假释实践中的司法腐败、倾斜适用、释放后再犯罪等问题较为严重。中央政法委员会、最高人民法院等相关部门连续出台指导意见,以规范减刑、假释的适用。然而,这些指导意见仅在政策上或程序上具有一定指导意义,对减刑、假释的制度缺陷却置若罔闻。众多学者及实务工

【参考文献】