刑事涉财产判决的执行问题研究
发布时间:2018-01-29 18:21
本文关键词: 财产刑 财产部分判决 执行难 执行程序 执行机制 出处:《上海交通大学》2014年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:1997年修订的《中华人民共和国刑法》大量设置了财产刑,由此刑事判决中适用财产刑的比例越来越高。同时近年来经济型犯罪、侵犯公民财产权利类案件始终处于高发态势,这使得大部分的刑事判决都会涉及财产部分的判决内容。但相较于对被告人人身刑的严格执行,在我国司法实践中,对有关财产刑及财产部分的执行却相对随意,执行到位率不高,一定程度上使涉及财产部分的刑事判决成为一纸空文。这严重影响了刑罚的设置目的,从而损害了司法裁判的严肃性和权威性。面对当前经济犯罪案件高发,涉案金额迅猛上升的严峻态势,如何完善刑事涉财产部分判决的执行机制,加大执行力度,切实发挥刑罚的惩戒与警示功能,已经成为司法机关防范与惩治犯罪的重要内容。 本文首先简要介绍了刑事涉财产判决的执行范围,阐述了目前司法实践中刑事涉财产判决执行难的现状,继而分析执行难的原因:既有被执行人履行能力不足,执行成本过高的客观因素,也有长期以来“重主刑轻附加刑”,对财产刑执行不够重视的主观因素,更主要的是在于立法不够完善,制度上存有缺陷,,如各机关职能不明确,缺乏有效配合,缺乏财产查控机制,缺乏监督机制等。在此基础上,本文提出应建立财产查控协调机制,特别是在侦查阶段加强对被告人财产的调查及控制;建立财产刑执行的监督机制;扩大罚金刑的减免事由,完善罚金刑的减免程序;设立罚金刑易科自由刑制度;完善有关执行程序等一系列解决方案。
[Abstract]:In 1997, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China amended a large number of property penalty, so the proportion of property penalty applied in the criminal judgment is higher and higher. At the same time, economic crimes in recent years. Infringement of civil property rights cases have always been in a high situation, which makes most of the criminal judgments will involve the content of the property part of the judgment, but compared with the strict execution of the defendant's personal punishment. In the judicial practice of our country, the execution of the property penalty and the property part is relatively arbitrary, and the execution rate is not high. To a certain extent, the criminal judgment involving the part of property becomes a dead letter, which seriously affects the purpose of setting up the penalty, thus damaging the seriousness and authority of the judicial decision, and facing the high incidence of economic crimes. The amount of money involved in the rapid rise in the grim situation, how to improve the criminal property part of the execution mechanism, strengthen the implementation of the force, and give practical play to the punishment of punishment and warning function. It has become an important content of the judicial organs to prevent and punish crime. Firstly, this paper briefly introduces the execution scope of the criminal property judgment, and expounds the current situation of the difficulty in the execution of the criminal property judgment in the current judicial practice. Then it analyzes the reasons for the difficulty of execution: there are not only the objective factors that the executor has insufficient ability to perform and the high execution cost, but also the subjective factor that has been paying more attention to the execution of property punishment for a long time. The more important is that the legislation is not perfect, there are defects in the system, such as the function of various organs is not clear, lack of effective cooperation, lack of property inspection and control mechanism, lack of supervision mechanism. On this basis. This paper puts forward that the coordination mechanism of property investigation and control should be established, especially the investigation and control of the defendant's property should be strengthened in the investigation stage. Establishing the supervision mechanism of the execution of property punishment; Expand the reasons for the reduction of fine punishment, improve the remission procedures of fine punishment; Establishing the system of free punishment of fine and punishment; Improve the implementation procedures and a series of solutions.
【学位授予单位】:上海交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D924.1;D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马兵;;论我国罚金刑制度的功能及完善[J];人民论坛;2014年02期
2 罗伟;;财产刑的退赔和民事债务混同时的处置原则[J];人民司法;2013年20期
3 闫燕;刘慧卓;;财产刑执行的相关问题研究[J];人民司法;2013年07期
4 胡茜筠;李哲;常健;;财产刑执行情况调研分析[J];人民检察;2013年04期
5 刘世友;;从现实迈向理想——罚金刑执行完善路径之探寻[J];法律适用;2013年01期
6 万志鹏;黄晓斌;;论没收财产刑中的“财产”[J];中国刑事法杂志;2011年04期
7 唐震;;评最高人民法院《关于财产刑执行问题的若干规定》[J];法治论丛;2010年05期
8 广东省佛山市中级人民法院课题组;;刑事附带民事诉讼案件审理与执行情况的调查报告[J];法律适用;2008年07期
9 高遥生;邢四文;陈卫东;李洪江;刘青峰;王九川;;聚焦刑事附带民事诉讼[J];法制资讯;2008年02期
10 沈亮;陈鸿翔;罗智勇;;我国刑事被害人救助制度初探[J];中国审判;2007年12期
本文编号:1474057
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1474057.html