入户抢劫认定疑难问题研究
发布时间:2018-01-30 05:48
本文关键词: 入户抢劫 抢劫罪 犯罪形态 共同犯罪 出处:《天津师范大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:入户抢劫行为因具有严重的法益侵害性,所以我国刑法对其规定了更加严重的法定刑。鉴于实务中出现的各种情形,最高法也多次通过司法解释就如何认定入户抢劫中的相关问题加以规范,但理论界与实务界仍对一些相关问题存在巨大争议。因此有必要对入户抢劫行为进行进一步的研究,以不断追求理论与实务的统一。本文是在借鉴前人研究成果基础之上而完成,一共分为以下四个部分:第一部分入户抢劫基本行为的认定中,阐述了入户抢劫行为中对"户"的认知和理解以及从行为人实施入户抢劫行为时对入户的认识、目的、方式和主体四个方面阐释了对"入户"的认识。本文认为,"户"是指能体现公民日常起居、体现主要财产存放地以及体现人们心灵归属和使人最值得安全信赖的空间场所。第二部分转化型入户抢劫认定中,笔者主要从转化型入户抢劫的概念、构成要件以及如何对转化型入户抢劫具体认定等方面作进一步研究。本文认为转化型入户抢劫的先行行为只包括入户盗窃一种,并且不要求先行行为达到构成犯罪的程度。第三部分从入户抢劫是否存在未完成形态以及理论和实务界对入户抢劫中"着手"的认定等方面对入户抢劫的犯罪形态问题进行了探讨。本文认为入户抢劫作为加重构成犯存在未完成形态,并且入户抢劫中的"着手"是指行为人为获取财物而将要对受害人实施暴力或者以暴力相威胁时才是着手。文章最后一部分从共同入户抢劫的特征和分类以及入户抢劫共同犯罪过限问题等方面对入户抢劫的共犯问题作了进一步的分析和探讨,以求对入户抢劫相关的问题有更完整和准确的把握。
[Abstract]:Because of the serious infringement of legal interests, the criminal law of our country prescribes a more serious legal penalty. In view of the various situations in practice. The Supreme Law also through the judicial interpretation of how to determine the relevant issues of home robbery to be standardized. However, there are still a lot of controversies in theory and practice. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the behavior of house robbery. In order to constantly pursue the unity of theory and practice. This article is based on the previous research results and completed, a total of four parts: the first part of the identification of the basic behavior of home robbery. This paper expounds the cognition and understanding of the "household" in the behavior of house robbery, and the understanding and purpose of the perpetrator when he carries out the behavior of "house robbery". The way and the main body explain the understanding of "entering the household". This article thinks that the "household" means that it can embody the citizens' daily living. Reflect the main property storage and reflect people's spiritual ownership and the most reliable place in space. The second part of the transformed home robbery identification, the author mainly from the transformation of the concept of home robbery. The constitutive elements and how to identify the specific aspects of the transformed robbery into the home and so on. This paper thinks that the first behavior of the transformed robbery only includes one kind of burglary. And do not require the first act to constitute a crime. The third part of the house robbery from whether there is not completed form and the theory and practice of home robberies in the "start" This paper discusses the problem of the criminal form of house robbery. The author thinks that there is an incomplete form in the form of robbery in the home as an aggravated crime. And the "go" in house robberies. The last part of the article starts from the characteristics and classification of joint house robbery and the problem of overlimitation of joint crime of robbery in the house. The last part of the article is to point out that the perpetrator is about to carry out violence or threaten the victim with violence in order to obtain property. On the other hand, this paper makes further analysis and discussion on the problem of accomplices in house robberies. In order to have a more complete and accurate grasp of the problems related to house robbery.
【学位授予单位】:天津师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谢仁杰;;论入户抢劫中的“户”[J];甘肃警察职业学院学报;2016年01期
2 黄奇中;;论“入户抢劫”的保护法益[J];海峡法学;2014年02期
3 张明楷;;论入户抢劫[J];现代法学;2013年05期
4 陈霞;;转化型入户抢劫研究[J];法制与社会;2012年09期
5 张明楷;;加重构成与量刑规则的区分[J];清华法学;2011年01期
6 李蕊;;浅析“入户抢劫”中的两个问题[J];行政与法(吉林省行政学院学报);2006年S1期
7 张永红;;“入户抢劫”新论[J];河北法学;2006年11期
8 黄祥青;;论抢劫罪情节加重犯的认定思路与方法[J];政治与法律;2005年06期
9 周振想,林维;抢劫罪特别类型研究[J];人民检察;1999年01期
10 肖中华;论抢劫罪适用中的几个问题[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1998年05期
,本文编号:1475456
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1475456.html