论拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪的适用空间

发布时间：2018-02-01 19:39

本文关键词： 拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪中立帮助行为　出处：《政治与法律》2017年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：网络服务提供者并不负有预先审查、实时监控网上信息的义务,而仅负有事后经通知后移除的责任,且帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪规定中的提供互联网接入等网络技术支持行为,通常属于不针对特定对象、用于合法用途而具有正当业务行为性质的中立帮助行为,因而我国立法者特意设置"经监管部门责令采取改正措施而拒不改正"的前置程序,以限制网络中立帮助行为的处罚范围,这正是拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪的立法价值与适用空间。网络服务提供者应分为信息接入或传输服务提供者、信息缓存服务提供者、信息存储服务提供者和信息定位(搜索、链接)服务提供者,而不包括内容服务提供者。"责令改正"程序具有防止损失扩大的"紧急保全"性质,即便网络服务提供者认为责令改正决定有误,也应及时改正,以避免损失的进一步扩大。
[Abstract]:Web service providers do not have the obligation to pre-censor and monitor online information in real time, but only to remove them after notification. And the provision of Internet access and other network technical support acts in the crime of helping information network criminal activities usually belong to neutral help acts which are not specific to specific objects and are used for legitimate purposes and have the nature of legitimate business behavior. Therefore, the legislator of our country specially set up the pre-procedure of "refusing to correct after the supervision department orders to take corrective measures", in order to limit the punishment scope of the net neutral help behavior. This is the legislative value and applicable space of refusing to fulfill the obligation of information network security management. Network service providers should be divided into information access or transmission service providers, information cache service providers. The information storage service provider and the information location (search, link) service provider, excluding the content service provider... the "order to correct" program has an "emergency preservation" nature of preventing the loss from expanding. Even if Web service providers believe that corrective decisions are wrong, they should correct them in time to avoid further expansion of losses.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 由《刑法修正案(九)》增设,作为我国《刑法》第286条之一的拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪的有关规定为:“网络服务提供者不履行法律、行政法规规定的信息网络安全管理义务,经监管部门责令采取改正措施而拒不改正,有下列情形之一的,处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制,并处或

【相似文献】