羁押期间表现影响量刑研究

发布时间：2018-02-02 08:10

本文关键词： 羁押期间表现刑罚根据量刑情节沉默权自证其罪　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,有的地方的检察院、法院、看守所出台规定,将犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在羁押期间的表现,纳入量考虑的范畴。犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在羁押期间的表现可否影响量刑这一问题,归属于犯罪嫌疑人、被告人犯罪后的表现可否影响量刑的判断问题。根据现在的刑罚根据原理,理论和实务上普遍承认犯罪后表现可以作为影响量刑考虑的因素。然而,羁押期间的表现是多种多样的,有必要对不同类型的表现进行具体区分,以判断哪些羁押期间表现可以影响量刑,哪些不可以用来作为影响量刑的因素。为此,有必要就目前各地方将犯罪嫌疑人、被告人羁押期间的表现纳入量刑的相关规定进行梳理,分析当前相关规定的特点、现状,从中可以发现将羁押期间表现纳入量刑考虑因素存在一些困惑。判断犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在罪前、罪中、罪后的表现,包括羁押期间的表现可否影响量刑,有必要对刑罚根据的立法根据和理论根据进行分析,其中"为监所管理需要"可否作为判断羁押期间影响量刑的根据应该是列入争论的重点。羁押期间表现纳入量刑考虑因素与其他理念可能存在的冲突,如与沉默权理念、与"反对强迫他人证实自己有罪"制度可能存在的冲突,要思考如何协调它们之间的紧张关系。对羁押期间表现,要根据具体表现形态、具体行为样态等,进行具体的识别,单纯"为监所管理需要"所定的事由、行使诉权、表达诉求的行为以及常态表现不能作为影响量刑的因素。羁押期间表现影响量刑还有一个重要的问题即证明问题,包括量刑信息收集主体、监督主体、确定量刑情节主体等方面,实务中让量刑信息更完整,进而做出公平公正的量刑,是我们努力的方向。
[Abstract]:In recent years, some local procuratorates, courts, detention centers issued regulations, the performance of suspects and defendants in custody, into the scope of quantitative consideration. Whether the performance of the defendant in custody can affect the sentencing, belong to the criminal suspect, the performance of the defendant after the crime can affect the sentencing judgment. According to the current principle of punishment. It is generally acknowledged theoretically and practically that post-crime performance can be used as a factor to influence sentencing. However, the performance in custody is diverse and it is necessary to make a specific distinction between different types of performance. In order to determine which period of detention performance can affect sentencing, which can not be used as factors affecting sentencing. Therefore, it is necessary to place suspects in various places. The performance of the defendant in custody into the relevant provisions of sentencing to comb, analysis of the current characteristics of the relevant provisions, the status quo. It can be found that there are some puzzles in taking the performance of custody into consideration of sentencing. Judge whether the performance of the suspect, the defendant before, in the crime, after the crime, including whether the performance during the detention can affect the sentencing. It is necessary to analyze the legislative and theoretical basis of the penalty basis. Whether "need for prison management" can be taken as the basis for judging sentencing during detention should be included in the debate. The possible conflict between the consideration of sentencing and other concepts is included in the performance of custody. If it conflicts with the idea of right to silence and the system of "against forcing others to prove their guilt", we should think about how to coordinate the tension between them. The concrete behavior pattern and so on, carries on the concrete identification, simply "for the prison management needs" the matter reason, exercises the right of action. The behavior of expressing demands and normal performance can not be used as factors to influence sentencing. There is also an important problem of proof of sentencing in custody, including sentencing information collection subject, subject of supervision. It is the direction of our efforts to make sentencing information more complete and to make a fair and just sentencing in practice.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D924.1

【参考文献】