渎职犯罪案件审理研究

发布时间：2018-02-03 19:42

本文关键词： 渎职犯罪案件审理现实危害制约因素对策　出处：《山东大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：渎职犯罪是一种社会危害性极大的犯罪,给国家造成巨额经济损失,给人民群众生命健康造成重大伤害,严重危害社会主义市场经济秩序,严重损害党群、干群关系,损害党和政府的形象。当前,我国正处于经济社会转型期,利益纷争逐步加剧,各类矛盾日益凸显。“渎职犯罪作为一种典型的职务犯罪,被称为‘不落腰包的腐败’,其对于社会的破坏力日益凸显,所造成的财产损失、社会危害十分严重。”现实中,由于多方面的原因,渎职犯罪案件存在因果关系认定复杂、非监禁刑适用较多、审判结果社会认同度不高等问题。存在的这些问题,给社会造成了不当的现实危害,尤其是渎职犯罪的轻刑化现状,一定程度上使得法律对渎职犯罪的威慑力,以及对渎职犯罪人的打击力度大打折扣,也使民众对法律公平正义的信赖产生了动摇。本文重点从渎职犯罪案件审理方面进行研究,包括以下内容：一是界说渎职犯罪案件审理的范畴。通过对渎职犯罪定义的理解,对其进行科学的分类和评价,可以帮助我们正确理解这一类罪的概念,在渎职犯罪案件审理中进行合理的定罪量刑,罪与非罪、此罪于彼罪的划分上,都具有一定的现实意义。找出渎职犯罪案件审理中存在的问题,为下一步提出对策做好铺垫。二是梳理渎职犯罪案件审理不当的现实危害。指出渎职犯罪案件审理不当造成的现实危害是：1、削弱刑罚打击力度。2、违背罪罚相适用原则。3、降低社会舆论评价。4、影响司法权威形象。三是分析渎职犯罪案件审理的制约因素。制约渎职犯罪案件审理的制约因素既有立法方面的,也有司法程序方面的,还有诸多的外部影响因素。四是提出渎职犯罪案件审理的建设性对策。通过对以上问题的研究和分析,提出建设性的对策：完善立法、科学操作、恰当量刑、排除干扰、审判创新。立法界、司法界应尽快行动起来,与理论界一道形成合力,共同来填补相关体制机制的漏洞。我们有理由相信,随着司法理念的日渐更新,体制机制的不断健全,法律规章的逐步完善,影响和制约当前渎职犯罪审理的各种因素状况必将彻底消除。
[Abstract]:The crime of dereliction of duty is a crime with great social harmfulness, which causes huge economic losses to the country, causes great harm to the lives and health of the people, seriously endangers the order of the socialist market economy, and seriously damages the Party and the masses. The relationship between cadres and the masses damages the image of the Party and the government. At present, our country is in the period of economic and social transformation, interests disputes are gradually intensified, various contradictions are increasingly prominent. "dereliction of duty as a typical duty crime." It is called "not to fall into the pocket" of corruption, its destructive power to the society is increasingly prominent, resulting in property losses, social harm is very serious. "in reality, due to various reasons. Dereliction of duty crime cases have complex causal relationship, non-custodial punishment is more applicable, trial results are not high degree of social identity and other problems. These problems have caused undue practical harm to the society. In particular, the light punishment of dereliction of duty, to a certain extent, makes the law deterrent to dereliction of duty, as well as the crackdown on dereliction of duty offenders greatly reduced. It also shakes the trust of the public in the fairness and justice of the law. This paper focuses on the trial of crimes of malfeasance, including the following: The first is to define the category of malfeasance crime trial. Through the understanding of the definition of dereliction of duty, the scientific classification and evaluation can help us to understand the concept of this kind of crime correctly. In the trial of dereliction of duty crime cases in a reasonable conviction and sentencing, crime and non-crime, this crime in the division of that crime, have a certain practical significance. Find out the malfeasance crimes in the trial of problems. For the next step to put forward countermeasures to do a good job. The second is to sort out the actual harm of malfeasance crime trial improper trial. Pointed out that malfeasance crime cases improper trial of the actual harm caused by the actual harm is: 1, weakens the penalty strike strength. 2, violates the crime punishment applicable principle .3. Reduce the public opinion evaluation. 4, affect the image of judicial authority. The third is to analyze the restrictive factors of dereliction of duty cases. The restriction factors of dereliction of duty cases are not only legislative aspects but also judicial procedures and many external factors. Fourth, put forward the constructive countermeasures of dereliction of duty cases. Through the research and analysis of the above problems, put forward constructive countermeasures: perfect legislation, scientific operation, appropriate sentencing, eliminate interference. Judicial innovation. The legislative and judicial circles should act as soon as possible and form a joint effort with the theorists to fill the loopholes in the relevant institutional mechanisms. We have reason to believe that with the increasing updating of judicial ideas. The continuous perfection of the system mechanism and the gradual perfection of laws and regulations will eliminate all kinds of factors which influence and restrict the trial of malfeasance crimes.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.393;D925.2

【参考文献】