运输毒品罪主观方面研究

发布时间：2018-02-08 19:03

本文关键词： 运输毒品罪明知推定认识错误　出处：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：主观方面,即犯罪的主观要件,不仅是定罪的重要标准,也是影响量刑轻重的重要依据。运输毒品罪是一种很严重的故意犯罪,主观方面则是行为人承担刑事责任的基础。司法实践中,运输毒品罪的主观方面不仅是案件解决的重点,而且还是难点。因此,有必要对该罪主观方面进行专门研究。本文首先对该罪主观方面的构成要素“犯罪故意中的认识因素和意志因素、犯罪目的与犯罪动机”进行阐述。其次,为解决该罪主观明知认定的实践困难,本文提出将推定作为认定该罪主观明知的有效证明方法,并对推定在认定主观明知中的司法适用进行了详细阐述。最后,在司法实践中经常发生该罪的认识错误问题,因此,对其认识错误的处断也很重要。本文主要分成四个部分,约三万五千字。第一部分:运输毒品罪犯罪故意中的认识因素和意志因素。首先,在认识因素方面,也就是“明知”要素包括明知内容和明知程度两部分。对于该罪明知的内容和明知的程度,我国刑法学界都存在不同的学说争议,本文都提出了自己的观点。其次,在意志因素方面,该罪犯罪故意中的意志因素除了可以由希望构成以外,还包括放任。该罪的间接故意具体形式主要有两种。第二部分:运输毒品罪的犯罪目的与动机。首先,对于犯罪目的是否是构成该罪的必要要件,刑法学界存在肯定说和否定说两种学说。本文赞同肯定说,并对否定说进行了针对性的反驳。紧接着,提出该罪应以流通毒品为犯罪目的。其次,论文分析了犯罪动机对该罪的量刑作用,犯罪动机是量刑的酌定情节。刑法中的犯罪动机可以分为三种类型:积极的犯罪动机、中性的犯罪动机和消极的犯罪动机。犯罪动机不同,对量刑的作用也不相同。第三部分:运输毒品罪主观明知的认定。首先,论文分析了运输毒品罪主观明知认定的实践困难。其次本文提出将推定作为认定该罪主观明知的有效证明方法,内容包括推定概述、适用推定认定主观明知的合理性和主观明知推定的基本规则。最后,本文从推定司法适用的具体要求、主观明知推定的经验法则和主观明知推定的注意事项三个方面论证了推定在认定该罪主观明知中的司法适用。第四部分:运输毒品罪认识错误的情形及其处断。第一,运输毒品罪认识错误的分类。本文根据该罪犯罪故意明知内容的不同,将运输毒品罪的认识错误分为运输毒品罪的法律认识错误和运输毒品罪的事实认识错误两大类别。第二,运输毒品罪认识错误的处断理论。本文在分析刑法学界对法律认识错误和事实认识错误有关处断理论的各种不同学说之后,提出了个人的见解。第三,运输毒品罪法律认识错误的情形及其处断。本文将运输毒品罪的法律认识错误分为三种情形:运输毒品罪积极的法律认识错误,运输毒品罪消极的法律认识错误和运输毒品行为定罪量刑的误认,并主要对后两种情形的处断进行了详细的论证。第四,运输毒品罪事实认识错误的情形及其处断。本文认为,依据行为人对事实明知内容的不同,运输毒品罪的事实认识错误可以分为两类:运输毒品罪的对象认识错误和运输毒品罪的客体认识错误。然后,又分别对运输毒品罪的对象认识错误和客体认识错误进行了具体的划分,并就这些不同情形如何处断进行了详细的阐述。
[Abstract]:The subjective aspect, namely the subjective elements of crime, is not only an important standard of conviction, is an important basis for sentencing. The crime of transporting drugs is a serious crime, the subjective aspect is the basis of behavior of criminal responsibility. In judicial practice, the subjective aspect of the crime of transporting drugs is not only the key to solve the case but, still difficult. Therefore, it is necessary to study the subjective aspect of the crime. Firstly, the subjective aspect of the crime elements of "crime of intentional cognition factor and will factor, criminal intent and motive for the crime" in this paper. Secondly, in order to solve the practical difficulties of the crime subjective cognizance, is put forward in this paper. The presumption identified as valid proof of subjective knowing the crime method, and the presumption in the judicial application of subjective knowing in detail. Finally, in the judicial practice often occurred in the Wrong understanding of sin, therefore, understanding of the error at the break is also very important. This paper is mainly divided into four parts, about thirty-five thousand words. The first part: the crime of transporting drugs cognition factor in the criminal intention and will factor. First of all, in the understanding of the factors, which is the element of "knowledge" includes two parts that content and knowing. For knowing the content and the crime of knowing the extent of China's criminal law scholars have different theories of controversy, this paper have put forward their views. Secondly, in the aspect of the crime will factor, the volitional factor in the criminal intention can constitute by hope, also includes two kinds of laissez faire. The crime of indirect intent forms. The second part: criminal intent and motive of the crime of transporting drugs. First of all, it is necessary for the purpose of crime constitution of this crime, criminal law scholars have positive and negative two This agrees with the theory. Surely, and the negative of the targeted retort. Then, put forward the crime should be based on the flow of drugs for criminal purposes. Secondly, this paper analyzes the sentencing of the crime motive of the crime, the criminal motive is sentencing circumstances in criminal law. The criminal motivation can be divided into three types: positive neutral motive for the crime, the criminal motive and the motive for the crime. The negative crime motive of different role in sentencing is not the same. The third part: the identification of subjective knowledge of the crime of transporting drugs. Firstly, this paper analyzes the practice difficulties of drug transport crime subjective cognizance. Secondly this paper will be considered as effective presumption proof of subjective knowing of the crime, including the overview of the application of presumption presumption, identification of the basic rules of subjective knowledge rationality and subjective presumption of knowledge. Finally, specific requirements from the presumption of judicial application, the main Three aspects of attention rule of experience and subjective view that presumption of presumption demonstrates that the application of presumption in subjective knowing in the crime of justice. The fourth part: the crime of transporting drugs and awareness of false break. First, the crime of transporting drugs is wrong classification. According to the crime of intentional content knowing the mistake, the crime of transporting drugs into the drug transport crime law and the wrong understanding of drug transport crime fact error two categories. Second, the crime of transporting drugs mistake at the breaking theory. After different theories based on the analysis of the criminal law on the legal awareness of errors and the fact error about breaking theory and put forward personal views. In third, the crime of transporting drugs and the legal awareness of false fault. This paper will recognize the crime of transporting drugs and legal errors are divided into three situations: the transport of toxic Wrong goods active legal crime, the crime of transporting drugs negative legal understanding of conviction and sentencing error and drug transport behavior mistake, and mainly analyses the two cases at fault in detail. Fourth, the crime of transporting drugs and the fact wrong fault. This paper argues that, according to the fact that behavior the different content of drug transport crime fact error can be divided into two categories: wrong object of the crime of transporting drugs and the wrong understanding of the crime of transporting drugs. Then, they were on the object of the crime of transporting drugs and the wrong understanding of object recognition error for a specific division, and these different situations how to break in detail.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.36

【相似文献】